"LOST WISDOM" : Rethinking Modernity In Iran by Abbas Millani
Being pathologically paranoid, racist, Anglophobe, West-phobe, Jewish-phobe, Christian-phobe, Zoroast-phobe, Baha'i-phobe, sunni-phobe and Islamic-centric, the Islamist theofascists in Iran would like you to believe that Democracy and Human Rights are Western constructs and a plot against Islam from the outside, concocted, of course, by the omnipotent Zionist/racist to destroy Islamic ummah. Though it's perfectly fine for them to use the term “kafir,” or "infidel", which is nothing more than a thinly veiled euphemism for 'covert racism' if you consider Isalm as a race via concept of Ummah.
The Islamic Republic remains wedded to a self-defeating, separatist and supremacist impulse, which, while most often justified in terms of avoiding un-Islamic influences, tends to manifest itself in the curious desire to separate from non-Muslims (infidels), even when this means lowering the living standards even lower than it is. Amir Taheri explains:
The president's favorite catchword is "khodkafa'I" or "self sufficiency." To the horror of most Iranians, especially the millions connected with the bazaars, who regard trade as the noblest of pursuits, Mr. Ahmadinejad insists that the only way Iran can preserve its "Islamic purity" is to reduce dependence on foreign commerce. "Whatever we can produce we should do ourselves," the president likes to say. "Even if what we produce is not as good, and more costly." His rationale goes something like this: The global economic system is a Jewish-Crusader conspiracy to keep Muslim nations in a position of weakness and dependency. Thus, Muslims would do better by relying on their own resources even if that means lower living standards.
Abbas Milani's book, "Lost Wisdom" dispels the notion that democracy and human rights are not organically native and intrinsically intertwined with the 7000-year Iranian history and culture. Excerpt from the publisher's review:
...He uses an impressive array of cross-disciplinary Western and Iranian theories and texts to investigate the crucial question of modernity in Iran today. Rethinking Modernity in Iran challenges the hitherto accepted theory that modernity and its related concepts of democracy and freedom are Western in essence. It also demonstrates that Iran and the West have more that brings them together than separates them in their search for such modern ideals as rationalism, the rule of law, and democracy.
"Milani shows that long before the European Renaissance generated the radical ideas that eventually reshaped Europe and the United States, Persian statesmen, artists, and intellectuals had formulated ideas that strikingly anticipate those of modernity.… Lost Wisdom is not only a powerful work of historical analysis; it is also a moving and eloquent account of a series of remarkable individuals, depicted with rare sensitivity and precision."—Stephen Greenblatt, Harvard University
The siege mentality of the Islamists like Ahmadinejad, whose aims are primarily at resisting or removing "evil" from the world (While being evil himself) rather than contributing good to it, bears the seed of self-destruction within itself and ultimately, in the larger scheme of things, does not need foreign invasion to make this malignant ideology irrelevant. The Islamist in Iran should be aware of the unity of all being and our mutual interdependency with every other person on the planet and with the earth itself, Islam must evolve in the 21st century in ways that make it sustainable not cause its demise.
That evolution will require a willingness to leave behind or transcend chauvinist, ultra-Islamist, (supremacists and imperialist) and tribalist elements of Islamic past, but to be authentic it must incorporate much of what has been spiritually vibrant in some Islamic traditions such as sufism.
Cruelty (stoning, torturing, finger-amputating, tongue-cutting...), wishing death upon other nations and people who don't think like you, Calling them pigs and dogs, and blowing yourself up in the name of religion are Not Destiny.
Next time an Islamist like Hoder talks about democracy and human rights being a "Western Conspiracy" or "inorganic" to Persian culture, tell him to read the first author of human rights charter, Cyrus the Great. The U.N. comparing it to the Human Rights Manifesto of the French National Assembly and the Charter approved by the United Nations with the Charter of Freedom of Cyrus, had decided that the latter appeared more valuable considering its age, explicitness, and rejection of the superstitions of the ancient world. Here is some more info. on that from Wikipedia:
The cylinder has been considered as the world's first known charter of human rights, as there are passages in the text have been interpreted as expressing Cyrus’ respect for humanity. It promotes a form of religious tolerance and freedom,[32] and the abolishment of slavery.[He allowed his subjects to continue worshipping their gods, despite his own monotheist beliefs.[35] In 1971, the United Nations published a translation of the document in all the official U.N. languages. A replica of the Cyrus Cylinder has reportedly been on display at United Nations headquarters in New York City as a tribute to Cyrus' display of respect and tolerance.
And while at it Hoder, you should be checking out the book, "Lost Wisdom" too.
5 comments:
Rethinking Modernity in Iran challenges the hitherto accepted theory that modernity and its related concepts of democracy and freedom are Western in essence.
Western concepts of democracy and freedom are inherently Western. The first global economy, accidentally set up by the British Empire and the present global economy, deliberately set up by supranational organizations like the World Trade Organization, World Bank, International Monetary Fund, etc., are inherently Western. o_O
Milani shows that long before the European Renaissance generated the radical ideas that eventually reshaped Europe and the United States, Persian statesmen, artists, and intellectuals had formulated ideas that strikingly anticipate those of modernity.
One could make the same argument about Islam's enlightenment, which predates the West's period of enlightenment by a few hundred years. Radical Islam is a new development, relatively speaking, so there is some truth to the claim that terrorists have hijacked the religion as a propaganda tool overemphasizing the worst aspects of the Koran.
It's good to know Amir Taheri now has an audience in the Wall Street Journal. Ugh.
"Islam's enlightnement":
Most of what you think as Islamic contribution was actually made by Persian and non-arab scientists and scholars who had to be loyal the Islamic court and were not allowed to publish in their own language...I have written about this before somwhere...the Islamic enlightnment was not because of Islam but in spite of it because they could afford it after they had looted and plundered other nations.
At any rate, I don't think you can ever convince me that Islam has contributed anything to at least my culture as an Iranian...all it has mangaged to do is to destroy it.Please watch engineering an empire if you get a chance on you tube.
Amir Taheri is one the most knowledgable people about Iran though he gets overzealous sometimes. You also can't just disregard Taheri because he is an Iranian who used to work for the Shah. Many people worked for the Shah. so what? You can bring evidence to disagree with him. Intoning "Shah’s newspaper editor" as a magic incantation doesn't obviate that. I see that the new style of 'debunking' is of the form: "Don't believe X as he is associated with Y".
Also, I'm sure you take Juan Cole seriously as an expert as I did before he started lying about what Ahamdinejad said about "wiping israel off the map". As a native speaker of Farsi, I can tell you what Ahamdinejad said if you consider linguistic context with which he chose those exact words, which by the way were not his words--he was merely repeating what Khomeini had said many times during and after the revolution--was much more lethal and vindictive than 'wipe off the map'. It consisted of an element of deeply rooted revenge which borderlined a curse!!! I will never trust that man again...he definitely has agendas...I don't what though...
The Islamic enlightenment was not because of Islam but in spite of it because they could afford it after they had looted and plundered other nations.
Pardon the cynicism but this is called progress. Civilizations are built upon civilizations. Sometimes peacefully, usually not.
At any rate, I don't think you can ever convince me that Islam has contributed anything to at least my culture as an Iranian...all it has managed to do is to destroy it.
As you are Persian and I'm not, nor do I know much of anything about Persian culture specifically, I'll let you have the last word.
Amir Taheri is one the most knowledgable people about Iran though he gets overzealous sometimes. You also can't just disregard Taheri because he is an Iranian who used to work for the Shah.
You can be a knowledgeable propagandist. I don't discount him because of his connections to the Shah. I discount him because he demonstrated he is willing to fool the West, and by extension the American people, for the good the Iranian people. I sympathize with the Iranian people but not to the point where America's interests should ever be subjugated to Iranian interests, even when the pretext for confrontation isn't false.
Also, I'm sure you take Juan Cole seriously as an expert as I did before he started lying about what Ahamdinejad said about "wiping Israel off the map". As a native speaker of Farsi, I can tell you what Ahamdinejad said if you consider linguistic context with which he chose those exact words, which by the way were not his words—he was merely repeating what Khomeini had said many times during and after the revolution—was much more lethal and vindictive than 'wipe off the map'. It consisted of an element of deeply rooted revenge which border lined a curse! I will never trust that man again...he definitely has agendas...I don't what though...
I didn't mention Juan Cole, Serendip. However, whether or not he has an agenda, does it make a difference? I mean, if the IRI ruled with an iron fist and did not have to contend with rival factions like the Basij, the prospect of them developing nukes might be slightly less scary.
Taheri did not try to fool the West. Read what he said in his interview:
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1178096596427&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull
And he wasn't saying anything that the muslims have not done before in the past. Have you heard of Zonar before? Here is the definition:
Zo´nar
n. 1. A belt or girdle which the Christians and Jews of the Levant were obliged to wear to distinguish them from Mohammedans.
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/Zonar
Zoroastrian had to wear a white piece of cloth somwhere on their shoulders. And I think the Jews belt had to be yellow.
What do you think is in the best interest of the US?
Serendip: Taheri did not try to fool the West. Read what he said in his interview.
That is not only what Taheri said, Serendip. His story, originally appearing on Canada's National Post, was not published merely to educate us on IRI backwardness. If you compare the Jerusalem Post's interview with a Benador Associates Press Release, you can not only see the lie, you can see the man continues to lie.
Per the Jerusalem Post:
"I speculated about what they were then going to do about religious minorities," Taheri explained to Jerusalem Post editors. "Then I went back to history—how Jews were distinguished; how Christians were distinguished; how Zoroastrians were distinguished. The Canadian paper presented this as a news story—as though it had already happened [as though Jews were going to be forced to wear the equivalent of the Nazi-imposed yellow star] - and everyone started attacking me [for giving false information]. It was really a big, big misunderstanding."
Per Benador Associates:
The law has been passed by the Islamic Majlis and will now be submitted to the Council of Guardians. A committee has been appointed to work out the modalities of implementation.
Benador Associates still has the original story up.
Serendip: Have you heard of Zonar before?
Thanks to Amir Taheri I have heard of Zonar. Also thanks to Amir Taheri, I know he's full of it.
Unfortunately, the original link to this story on The Australian is no longer up, but:
IRAN'S only Jewish MP strongly denied reports in a Canadian newspaper overnight that Iran may force non-Muslims to wear coloured badges in public so they can be identified.
"This report is a complete fabrication and is totally false," Maurice Motammed said in Tehran. "It is a lie, and the people who invented it wanted to make political gain" by doing so.
Finally, when it comes to people linked to Benador Associates, a microphone for failed neoconservative policies, I discount them out of hand. Call me guilty of using on guilt-by-association. In this case, you would be correct.
Serendip: What do you think is in the best interest of the US?
#1 would probably be aggressively research and development for energy independence. We will never get our Middle East policy morally correct until we stop relying on the region and supporting despotic regimes with oil.
#2 would probably be drop trade/agricultural tariffs so nations, especially struggling democracies, have a shot at becoming economically sustainable and independent, and hopefully avoid failed state status. Except in rare cases, economies develop in stages. Enclave status and light industry, the first two stages, are very susceptible to capsizing from the billions the U.S. and Europe spend on subsidies. They simply cannot compete with us, and wealth is, unfortunately, incredibly important to democracies:
Rejecting the idealist account, realists insist that democracies do not arrive in deus ex machine fashion—and certainly not as a mechanical outcome of the introduction and spread of new ideas around the world. As scholars have pointed out repeatedly, democratic stability is well correlated with economic development. At least since World War II, as per capita income has gone up, so has the chance a country will be democratic. Whereas only 20 percent of countries with a per capita income of $1,000 have been democratic since 1950, about 40 percent with $4,000 and 90 percent with $11,000 or more have. Furthermore, no democracy has collapsed in any country with a per capita income over $7,000.
Post a Comment