Mullahs in Norway and the Lies they Weave!

On his recent visit to Norway the former terrorist President of the Islamic Republic, Mullah Mohammad Khatami, received a strong condemnation for his regime's human rights violations. Another Mullah, which was part of Khatami's terrorist lobby-delegation, was grilled by a Norwegian journalist on human rights and democracy in Iran to which the Mullah replied "we have Islamic democracy and human rights in Iran which is different from the western kind" (Lie Number 1. Human rights are not recognized and are irrelevant in a theocracy. The only rights available to subjects are religious rights dictated by Sharia) with a smirk on his face; when further probed on the issue the mullah excuses himself and leaves not to further lose face.



The Norwegian Reporter, God Bless him (I wish I had his email), did much better in grilling this terrorist mullah than his American counterparts in interviewing Ahmadinejad in New York last summer. However, the Norwegian reporter fell for this mullah's lies because he didn't know any better. Apparently all the psycho-mullahs and their left-leaning academicians and apologists have been issued the same propaganda instruction manual by the IRI. Here comes the second lie by this terrorist mullah.

Let me explain. These shameless demagogue mullahs and the treacherous pseudo-left string pullers like Edalat and Rostami, scraping the bottom of the barrel. They, erroneously and deceptively, bring up the moderate rise of women participation in schools and universities after the bloody revolution as a sign of "progress" and "improvement" in the situation of women in the post-revolution era. As if the Late Shah had forbidden women to go to school or education was not available for them. In fact, the minister of education was a woman who was later executed by Khomeini's regime. Also, note, that the assortment of shill and propaganda arm of the IR never mention how many people (women and men) became educated after the Shah came to power and you will never hear them talk about how backward Iran was economically, socially, politically before the Shah, in a way, took the power back from the medieval clergies along with their ultra-corrupt patrons who kept most Iranians uneducated and poor for centuries.

The reason some girls did not attend schools during the Shah era was not because they didn't have equal rights in the eyes of the law. Their Parents *chose* and *forbid* their daughters to go to school because they deemed schools as "Un-Islamic" because of the Shah's mandatory anti-hejab law, which in the end gave women a choice to wear or not wear the hejab.

My friend Potkin writes: Before 1979, many religious families in Iran, nothing to do with working class many of the super religious families in Iran were Bazaaris, middlemen and street peddlers, would stop their daughters from going on to further education, because they thought they would become corrupt.

Once the Islamic revolution came about and the "cultural revolution" Islamicized the universities, these families felt more relaxed about letting their daughters to go to universities -(Read Shirin Ebadi's book on this). And if you've been follwoing the News on Iran, this issue in itself has become a thorn in the side of the clergy and now they are blaming the ills of the society on too many women in universities, so they are talking about "sahmiehbandi jensi" -"gender allocation" in higher education.

Link Via Aryamehr