Richardson's Cluelessness

Truly Disgusting or Has he been bought?

Richardson stressed that one of the conditions on talking to Iran must be that the United States sets no preconditions. The Democratic presidential candidate blamed the Bush administration for lecturing Iran's leadership, telling them what they could and could not do before sitting down and talking with them. He called this policy "counterproductive." "Talking without preconditions does not mean backing off one inch over fundamental objectives, such as ensuring that Iran never acquires nuclear weapons," said Richardson. "Preventing Iran from going nuclear will require strong diplomacy ... and realism. We must remember that no nation has ever been forced to renounce nukes - but many have been persuaded to do so with a combination of carrots and sticks."

The key to successful negotiations with Iran, according to the governor of New Mexico, is to convince the Iranians "that they will be better off and more secure without nukes than with them." Additionally, Iran needs to be given a "face-saving" exit. Taking lessons from the Cold War, Richardson stresses that deterrence is a matter of clarity and credibility. "We need to be absolutely clear that a nuclear Iran is unacceptable, and we need to be absolutely credible when we say what we will do about it if the Iranians continue to disregard the will of the international community. "The clear message must be this: Develop nukes and you will face devastating global sanctions.

Desist from developing nukes and you will receive meaningful rewards, including robust security guarantees and guaranteed supplies of nuclear fuel from abroad." This sort of argument, says Richardson, leaves no room for doubt. "This sort of engagement, with a stick in one hand and a carrot in the other, is how we got Libya to renounce nukes, and this is how we must approach Iran." Richardson outlines "at least six major reasons why Iran is strategically significant."

First, because of its nuclear ambitions; second, the role Iran plays in the stability of Iraq; third, the support that the Islamic republic offers groups such as Hezbollah and Hamas, who in turn are obstacles to the stability of Lebanon and the Palestinian-Israeli peace process; fourth, the important role that Iran plays as a major oil and gas producer; fifth, Iran's strategic control of the Straits of Hormuz; finally, its influence as a leader of the world's Islamic Shiite population.

US-Iranian relations have not been helped by events such as the storming of the US embassy in Tehran shortly after the 1979 Islamic revolution, when Iranian students held 52 American diplomats for 444 days. An incident, Richardson reminds us, "that has poisoned relations between the United States and Iran for nearly 30 years." "We must have no illusions about President [Mahmoud] Ahmadinejad - a dangerous man with truly reprehensible views." But, adds Richardson, the United States must have the courage to admit its own errors, such as the support that the country gave "the Shah's repressive regime," the support that it gave Saddam Hussein during the Iran-Iraq war, and the silence when Saddam used chemical weapons against Iran. "Both we and the Iranians need to acknowledge this difficult shared history, and work to get beyond it."