The Islamic Republic officially Supports the Democratic Party!
How proud this must make the likes of Harry Reid, Baker et al, and Kucinich.
This is another potential proof, that the Reformist movement in Iran is part and parcel of
the Democratic establishment's long-nurtured strategy to sell out Iranian people to the oligarchical mullahs (Khatami, Rafsanjani, Khamenai, Inc.)
h/t to Gateway pundit
ABF, for the promotion of human rights and democracy in Iran
10 comments:
This is another proof, that the Reformist movement in Iran is part and parcel of the Democratic establishment's long-nurtured strategy to sell out Iranian people to the oligarchical mullahs (Khatami, Rafsanjani, Khamenai, Inc.)
And 9/11 was an inside job. :)
Lesly: As if this is the first time the Democrats have done this.
I noticed you don't like to read but please try to read the links I provide.
You should Read this:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/5/23/103646/740
Experience have thought me (I used to be a democrat up until 2 years ago). The problem with the democrats is that their arguments are not in good faith. They already have a well-established point of view, and it's pretty much that of the mullah's regime. Most are content with parroting official democratic doctrine and indoctrination by the DNC. They politicize human sufferings and that I cannot stomach.
Lesly: As if this is the first time the Democrats have done this.
Read about how the enemy (Iran) of my enemy (Russia) is my friend? Is there something specific you want to point out to me? On a sidenote, it's nice to see William Engdahl gives neocon idiot Bernard Lewis the mention he deserves.
I noticed you don't like to read but please try to read the links I provide.
I like to read what a person writes. I don't think using external links is a good way to prove your point. I would have liked to hear your response in my blog in your own words.
You should Read this: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/5/23/103646/740
What should I do with Daily Kos, Serendip? I never read it. Why don't you tell me yourself?
The problem with the Democrats is that their arguments are not in good faith.
I generally agree with this statement. That is modern politics.
They already have a well-established point of view, and it's pretty much that of the mullah's regime.
The Democrat Party wants to hang dissenters from forklifts? They want to Christianize the Republic?
Most are content with parroting official Democratic doctrine and indoctrination by the DNC.
I can't agree with this. One of the Democrat Party's major shortcomings is their tolerance for division among the ranks. They're not disciplined like Republicans, they don't circle the wagons when one of their own is wounded. It's like trying to herd cats into a corral with the Democrat Party.
They politicize human sufferings and that I cannot stomach.
Offer examples. Then tell me how the Republican Party doesn't politicize human suffering.
Lesly: I couldn't have found a better person than yourself to prove my points if I'd tried.
In the meantime, let's just agree to disagree. I hate debates and I hate politics and I hate blogging and I hate writing (I'm a horrible writer). The only reason I'm doing this is because I hate lies, injustice and disinformation that is being put out by so many people who have agendas. Let's agree to disagree. Thanks.
Lesly: I couldn't have found a better person than yourself to prove my points if I'd tried.
Well, it's too bad you hate writing. You've shown me nothing that says you're a horrible writer. It's your blog to put up as many articles as you like, but I'm not sure which points I proved since you never air your points yourself.
Here's the thing, Serendip. Even if I read every external link you provide nothing says I will make the same conclusions you make. Then when I resume the conversation about that information we'll be talking in circles. That's not very helpful in my opinion.
Oh well.
Dear Lesly: I'm sure you're right to a certain extent regarding processing a given information and coming up with a different conclusion. In cognitive science, it's called confabulation or assimilation and accommodation. At any rate, I hope to become a better writer and develope a desire to debate in the future...
Thanks for stopping by anyways.
In cognitive science, it's called confabulation or assimilation and accommodation.
Touché. ::smirks:: Not quite what I had in mind. More like, I've never read a article/book/blog/etc. capable of expressing exactly what I think and feel. Hence making my own blog. References are helpful for objectively/subjectively backing up personal arguments and I avoid assuming said articles/books/blogs/etc. are representative of everything the source-provider believes.
Without making your own arguments, however brief, I feel I have no choice except to take your links as representative of everything you believe. Maybe it is foolish on my part to think so, but I don't think that is possible.
Lesly: I really don't know what I believe anymore...I've concluded that nothing is what it seems to be...and I can only try to make sense of it all. This is why you don't see any arguments from me because I'm not certain of anything.
I've concluded that nothing is what it seems to be.
I agree with this. It is a self-evident truth. I am no longer as "Democratic" as I used to be, but I am still liberal, still a registered Democrat with some libertarian leanings in foreign and domestic policy issues.
If I may make a suggestion, get familiar with classical conservative and liberal philosophers. Good luck on your journey, Serendip. :)
Will do. Thanks and good luck to you too. take care!
Post a Comment