Showing posts with label Islamic Republic. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Islamic Republic. Show all posts

Sunday, September 09, 2007

Iran spy post heightens Gulf tension with US

Iran has established a sophisticated spying operation at the head of the Arabian Gulf in a move which has significantly heightened tensions in its standoff with the United States.

Age of the cyber spy

The operation, masterminded by the country’s elite Revolutionary Guard, includes the construction of a high-tech spying post close to the point where Iranian forces kidnapped 15 British naval personnel in March.

The move has forced British and American commanders to divert resources away from protecting oil platforms in the Gulf from terrorist attack and into countering the new Iranian threat.

The US military says that the spying post, build on the foundations of a crane platform sunk during the Iran-Iraq war, is equipped with radar, cameras and forward facing infra-red devices to track the movement of coalition naval forces and commercial shipping in the northern Arabian Gulf.

Commanders fear that one of the main purposes of the Iranian operation is to enable the Revolutionary Guard to intercept more coalition vessels moving through the disputed waters near the mouth of the Shatt al Arab waterway south of the Iraqi city of Basra.

The disastrous British handling of the hostage crisis has convinced some in the Iranian regime that there is mileage in further such attempts.

But the US military believes the listening post could also be used to help Iranian forces target commercial shipping in response to any US air strikes on its nuclear facilities.

Such operations would form part of their threat to launch guerrilla or asymmetric attacks on western interests if Iran is attacked.

US forces have responded by establishing their own listening post, positioning it on an oil platform just across the maritime border between Iraq and Iran from the Iranian position. The two spying posts are now monitoring each other’s activity.

British naval personnel who have recently served in the Gulf have told The Sunday Telegraph that tensions between the Americans and the Iranians have soared, with both sides heavily involved in espionage and counter-espionage operations.

British forces are also on high alert in an attempt to prevent any repeat of the March incident. “The Revolutionary Guard navy comes out every day to cruise around on their side of the line in their fast patrol boats and drop of supplies at their surveillance base,” one said.

“Every one is being very careful. The last thing anyone wants is for things to get out of control by mistake.

“The northern Gulf continues to be tense with the Americans and Iranians keeping a close eye on each other. Both sides sends out patrol boats to watch the other side and they have both set up bases packed with spy gear – loads of radars and cameras.”

British personnel said that Iranian activity had forced them to rethink their priorities in the Gulf: “Up to March, when our sailors were captured by the Iranians, coalition patrols concentrated on protecting Iraq’s oil export terminals from al-Qaeda suicide bombers.

"Now watching the Iranians is our top priority. We don’t want to be taken by surprise again and we need to keep know what they are doing in case things kick off if the Yanks bomb the Iranian nuclear sites.”

The Iranian spying post is located in shallow waters southeast of the tip of the Al Faw peninsular. It is located in water claimed by Iran, although the maritime boundary in the area is disputed by the Iraqi government.

In March 15 British sailors and marines - 14 men and one woman - were captured when their small craft were ambushed by a larger Iranian force of gunboats during a boarding operation at the mouth of the Shatt al Arab.

They were held for almost two weeks and accused of spying before being pardoned by President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and deported back to the UK.

The subsequent fiasco over media deals to pay some of the sailors for their stories handed the Iranians a propaganda coup. British forces say the presence of the spying post has made it even more difficult to operate in the area.

“The Iranian surveillance base has been set up in a large naval crane that was sunk during the Iran-Iraq war. It is just across the boundary line and has a radar and night vision cameras to keep us under surveillance 24 hours a day.

"On our side of the line the Yanks have set up their surveillance base on a charted barge moored along side the Khawr Al Amaya oil terminal.

“The boundary line between Iraqi and Iranian waters runs only few hundred yards from the exclusion zone set up around the terminal and we have little choice but to send our people out close to Iranian waters.

"We are toe to toe with the Iranians here.

"The US Navy and the allies don’t venture out there unless they are all tooled up and have loads of boats in support. We are not taking any chances any more.”

The development is the latest sign of the growing tensions between the US and Iran, which Washington has accused of supporting attacks on its forces in Iraq.

With Iran last week announcing that it had achieved its goal of 3,000 centrifuges to enrich uranium for its nuclear programme, the prospect of US military action has increased.

Despite Iranian assurances that it is only seeking to develop a peacesful nuclear programme to meet its future power needs, the US believes it is intent on developing nuclear weapons.

Iran has warned that it will hit back if the US launches air strikes against its nuclear facilities and shipping in the Gulf would be expected to be high on its list of targets.

Iran has three submarines stationed at the Bandar Abbas naval base on the northern shore of the strategically crucial Strait of Hormuz, where the Gulf is at its narrowest, and these would be expected to play a significant role in any campaign against shipping.

A report in the respected Janes Defence Weekly magazine, published tomorrow, quotes coalition naval personnel in the region reporting regular patrols by Iranian Revolutionary Guards - the same force responsible for the capture of the British service personnel in March.

The Guards are reported to conduct regular patrols in small patrol craft and speed boats along the boundary of their territorial waters.

Regular Iranian naval forces, which include frigates and corvettes moored at Bandar Abbas, are considered more vulnerable to pre-emptive US strikes and there is less reliance on them n the northern Arabian Gulf.

Read more!

Monday, August 06, 2007

Come with me to Quom!



From Finger's blog:

با من به قمی آباد بیایید
قمی آباد، بیخ ِ گوش ِ تهران خوابیده . کمتر از سی کیلومتر با پایتخت ِ حکومت ِ اسلامی ِ ایران ، با ام القرای ِ نمایندگان ِ الله بر کره ی ِ ارض و با شبیه ترین جامعه به مدینة النبی فاصله دارد . تا به حال آنجا را دیده اید ؟ من شما را به قُمی آباد خواهم برد .قُمی آباد نه شهر است، نه روستا . نه قصبه است ، نه قلعه . حتا به اندازه ی ِ قلعه ی ِ سابق یا همان شهر ِ نو ، شاکله و بنیاد ندارد . قمی آباد محله ی ِ خوفناکی است درست وسط ِ بیابان . یک محله ی ِ زور آبادی و بسیار محروم که دورتادورش تا چشم کار می کند بیابان است و تا گوش می شنود زوزه ی ِ سگان ِ ولگرد ... در جاده ی ِ تهران ـ ورامین ، اندکی بعد از مهاجر نشین ِ قرچک، کوره راهی انحرافی ما را به دل ِ بیابان و به محله ی ِ قمی آباد می رساند .قمی آباد یک خیابان ِ آسفالته ی ِ قدیمی و پر چاله دارد با دو بقالی و یک مسجد و تعدادی خانه ی ِ الکی ساز . حدوداً پنجاه خانوار در آن زندگی می کنند که شغل ِ اصلی ِ همه ی ِ آنان پخش و توزیع ِ مواد ِ مخدر است . از تریاک و هرویین تا شیشه و کراک و حشیش ، هرچه بخواهید در آنجا یافت می شود .


اما اشتباه نکنید ! قمی آباد ویترین ِ خوبی برای ِ عرضه ی ِ کالا نیست . چرک و ترسناک و پرت است . مشتری را می رماند . به ندرت ممکن است زن یا مرد ِ معتادی ـ که در شرایط ِ امروز ِ ایران ممکن است عضو ِ هر طبقه یا صاحب ِ هر پیشه ای باشد ـ در این راه ِ صعب و خطرناک قدم بگذارد . اصلاً نیازی به این همه زحمت نیست . کافی است فرد ِ معتاد برای ِ به دست آوردن ِ مواد در محل ِ سکونتش به اولین پارک یا نزدیک ترین میدانچه مراجعه کند تا مواد فروشان یا به اصطلاح ساقیان به سرعت نیازش را برطرف کنند . حتا می تواند به کیوسک های ِ روزنامه فروشی سر بزند و همراه با ماده ی ِ افیونی یک روزنامه ی ِ عصر هم بخرد ! پس در قمی آباد خرده فروشی در اولویت نیست . محله، به باراندازی شبیه است که اجناس را به طور ِ عمده در آن تخلیه می کنند .


توزیع ِ گسترده ی ِ مواد مخدر در محله های ِ جنوبی تهران ( به خصوص میدان ِ شوش ) و نیز قرچک و پیشوا و ورامین ، عملیاتی است که به وسیله ی ِ اهالی ِ قمی آباد صورت می گیرد .قمی آباد حدوداً سی سال سابقه دارد . یعنی عمر ِ نکبت بارش برابر با سال های ِ استقرار ِ جمهوری ِ اسلامی است . مردم ِ قمی آباد کماکان با جمهوری ِ اسلامی رابطه ی ِ تنگاتنگ دارند . به این معنا که حکومت ِ اسلامی خروارها ماده ی ِ افیونی را مستقیماً در دامنشان می گذارد و از آنان به عنوان ِ عوامل ِ پخش استفاده می کند . در این مورد، گفته های ِ اهالی و کند و کاو های ِ شخصی بر من ثابت کرد که آقازاده ها و ماموران ِ وزارت ِ اطلاعات رابط هایی هستند که مواد ِ افیونی را در اختیار ِ اهالی قرار می دهند . حتا برخی از ماموران ِ بلندپایه ی ِ وزارت ِ اطلاعات به عنوان ِ پیشنماز در مسجد ِ قمی آباد فعالیت و بر توزیع ِ محموله ها نظارت می کنند . بیهوده نیست که گشت های ِ نیروی ِ انتظامی به محله وارد نمی شوند .



با این همه نباید تصور کرد از این خوان ِ یغما سهم ِ زیادی به توزیع کنندگان می رسد . آنان واسطه هایی خرده پا هستند که یا پول ِ چندانی به دست نمی آورند یا اگر به دست بیاورند در خرج کردنش مختار نیستند . اکثر ِ مردم ِ قمی آباد به شغل رانندگی اشتغال دارند . از رانندگی ِ تراکتور بگیرید تا رانندگی ِ تاکسی و موتورسیکلت . برخی زیر ِ پوشش ِ راننده ی ِ تاکسی و مسافرکش به توزیع ِ مواد ِ مخدر می پردازند و بعضی چون پیک های ِ موتوری، محموله ها را در شهر های ِ اطراف پخش می کنند . البته رانندگان ِ ماشین های ِ سنگین گاه از طرف ِ ماموران ِ حکومت به ماموریت های ِ پر درآمد فرستاده می شوند و مثلاً برای ِ آوردن ِ یک تریلی مواد ِ مخدر از زاهدان به تهران بیست تا سی ملیون تومان دستمزد می گیرند . اما حتا آنان نیز نمی توانند به طور کلی از قمی آباد ِ ادبار زده نقل ِ مکان کنند . به نظر می رسد ماموران ِ اطلاعات و امنیت کاملاً بر زندگی ِ قاچاق چیان چنبره زدند و اجازه نمی دهند کسی از تیررس ِ آن ها خارج شوند .در قمی آباد فقر ، سوء تغذیه ، بیماری و اعتیاد بیداد می کند . فروشندگانی که عاقل تر بوده اند، معتاد نشده اند اما بسیاری از فروشندگان هم معتادند .



عده ای از آن ها حتا جای ِ خواب ندارند و روی ِ بسته های ِ یونجه شب را به صبح می رسانند . پای ِ دیوارها می توان معتادانی را دید که مدت هاست از خط ِ قرمز گذشته اند . مردها و زن های ِ قمی آباد هرکدام بیست سال پژمرده تر از سن ِ خود نشان می دهند و کودکان که آینده را همراه با خاک های ِ کوچه بر باد می دهند، چهره هایی مات دارند . نکته ی ِ تکان دهنده این که پس از سی سال و با توجه به این همه سرمایه که از فعالیت ِ قاچاق فروشان به جیب ِ حکومت می رود، قمی آباد هنوز از داشتن ِ آب ِ نوشیدنی محروم است . مردم برای ِ آوردن ِ آب مجبورند عرض ِ جاده ی ِ خطرناک ِ ورامین را عبور کنند و در آنسوی ِ جاده مسافت ِ زیادی را تا اولین آبادی بپیمایند و از موتورهای ِ آب، بانکه هایشان را پر کنند . در این سال ها شمار ِ زیادی از اهالی ِ قمی آباد نتوانسته اند بانکه های ِ آب را به خانه برسانند چرا که به هنگام ِ عبور از جاده با ماشین تصادف کرده و کشته شده اند .



بررسی ِ قمی آباد یک بار ِ دیگر ثابت می کند حکومت ِ اسلامی حتا به پادوها و خدمتگزارانش رحم نمی کند و آنان را در پست ترین شرایط ِ زیست نگاه می دارد . نشان می دهد یک حکومت ِ اطلاعاتی ـ امنیتی بر ایران حکمرانی می کند که با پخش و گسترش ِ مواد ِ افیونی روح و جسم ِ مردمانش را می سوزاند و تباه می کند . آرزوهای ِ آنان را حقیر ، خلاقیت ِ آنان را نابود و اعتراض ِ آنان را سرکوب می کند . نشان می دهد پادویی برای ِ این حکومت بدعاقبتی است ؛ چه در لباس ِ استادان ِ اتو کشیده و ادوکلن مالیده ی ِ دانشگاه های ِ غربی و چه در شندره پوشی ِ مردم ِ فلک زده و خرده پای ِ قمی آباد .... متاسفانه قمی آباد تافته ی ِ جدابافته ای از تمامیت ِ جامعه ی ِ ایران نیست .

Read more!

Sunday, August 05, 2007

Islamic Republic's manufactured universe!

Reminiscent of "Baghdad Bob", Mohammed Saeed al-Sahaf, Saddam's former Minister of DisInformation, IRNA, the official Iranian New Agency, is promoting a story with the following headline: Enemy can by no means attack Iran: Air Force commander . There's a picture attached to the story that's supposed to be the brave Iranian Air Force. Here it is:


If those planes look familiar to you it's because they're the Thunderbirds, the official flight demonstration team of the U.S. Air Force. Have the T-Birds gone over to other side?Looks like IRNA couldn't find enough of their own jets to get in the air, or didn't dare fly them that close to one another. I'm pretty sure the Thunderbirds are still on our side.(You can see the full-sized photo on IRNA here.)

In a related news, Gateway Pundit reports that Iran's new jet, Azarakhsh, is Iran's old jet, Saegheh (Thunder)

Another oddity is that while Iran has to import oil to the tune of $6-10 billion dollars annually due to lack of not enough refineries, the Islamic Republic in its "infinite wisdom" has decided that Senegal's need supersedes Iran's desperate need of refineries.

Yet we find that the international community has been buying this kind of disinformation from the IRI for a long time: Iran forgets to build nuclear power plants for its "peaceful" use ( but enriched Uranium and yellow cake it has). This illustrates that it is not just Iranians who are magnificently manipulated but we in the West are suceptible to disinformation too.



After U.S. Forces Seized Baghdad's Airport:
"We butchered the force present at the airport. We have retaken the airport! There are no Americans there!"--Baghdad Bob


Link via Holycoast

Read more!

Wednesday, August 01, 2007

Madness Rules in Iran: "VEIL IS FOR SEXUAL AROUSAL"


It seems like the entire country is going mad. Are we living in an era of globalized lunacy and incompetence--and pathetic political spin? Nothing seems to bother these lunatic; They smile, sneer, issue threats and fatwas against infidels, waste money on mercenaries in Lebanon and Iran (there are rumors that some of the tortureres in Iran are Lebanese) and Palestine, while Iran goes to hell in a handbasket.

Kamangir has this:
State-Run Newspaper: “Veil is for Sexual Arousal, Jews are Fine with Incest”

“Veil, for Enhancing the Sexual Passion or for Suppressing it?” is the title of an article published in Resalat, a far-right state-run newspaper. The author, Seiied Reza Alavi ( سيد رضا علوي) writes, “Jewish culture is one of the sexiest in the world, in which sexual relationship between father and daughter, son and mother, and brother and sister are tolerated and considered acceptable“. He continues, “In Islam, veil is to preserve sexual passion and to arouse sexual thoughts. This gives a meaning to sex and does not ruin its meaning, as nudity does… Sex and hunger have been the framework in which human culture has grown up. Religion has stepped in this framework and has given a humane meaning to all this. Thus, no religion forgets sex.” The author then comprehensively discusses the human history, and different religions, and concludes, “Thus, veil is a sexual tradition which arouses sexuality in the society and then pushes for its satisfaction through wedlock”.
No comment. The picture is decorative.

Related: Sex Advice in the Sharia

Read more!

Swedish Newspaper Main Headline: "Iran, Where the Criminals Govern"



GÖTEBORGS-POSTEN, Swedish Newspaper
Iran press News
روزنامه سوئدی: ایران؛ جائی که جنایتکاران حاکمند

روزنامه سوئدی یوتبوری پستن در
سرمقاله روز دوشنبه خود با عنوان 'جائی که جنایتکاران حاکمند'، با انتقاد از سکوت جامعه جهانی در برابر فجایعی که در ایران رخ می دهد، نوشت به همه چیز میتوان عادت کرد. مثلا به اینکه ایران توسط مشتی یاغی و وحشی اداره شود.

The Swedish Newspaper, GÖTEBORGS-POSTEN , on it's Monday issue offers this main headline:
"Iran, Where Criminals Govern". Criticizing the international community's silence concerning the atrocities being perpetrated in Iran, it says, You Can Get Used to Anything, Even the fact that Iran is governed by a clique of savages and thugs.



این روزنامه نوشت یکشنبه بیست و دوم جولای رادیوی دولتی در ایران اعلام کرد که دوازده نفر بطور همزمان به دار آویخته شدند. شاید در ذهن خود تصور کنید دریچه ای زیر پای اعدامی گشوده می شود و سپس با کشیده شدن طناب دار مهره گردن او شکسته می شود و محکوم فوری می میرد. نه، در ایران قربانی را خفه می کنند. اغلب اعدامیها را با جرثقیل بدار می کشند و آنها را زجرکش می کنند.

This newspaper reported that 12 people were hanged simultaneously in one day. The newspaper said, " You might think that a little door opens under the accused feet and then the rope is pulled to break the neck of the accused is killed instantly. But no, in Iran, the accused is strangled. Often, those who are sentenced to death are hanged by crane and are tortured/strangled to death.



یوتبوری پستن نوشت فهم این مطلب دشوار است. اما در شبکه اینترنت فیلمی که مخفیانه از یک اعدام در ایران گرفته شده، دیده می شود. دو مرد و یک زن که دور گردنشان طنابی پیچیده شده با یک جرثقیل بالا کشیده می شوند. دو مرد اعدامی سریع بیهوش می شوند، اما زن نگون بخت بالای چوبه دار دست و پا می زند.

Goteborg Posten writes, "Comprehending this brutality is very difficult." But you can clearly see the strangulation in the video clip 3 accused are hoisted up by a crane....

این روزنامه نوشت فکر نکنید این امر باعث خجالت و شرم ساری سران رژیم تهران از جمله احمدی نژاد و خامنه ای می شود، برعکس؛ اجرای اعدامهای وحشیانه در ملاعام بخشی از سیاست آنها است. این جانیان از این طریق می خواهند به مردم یادآور شوند که اگر از حاکمان اطاعت نکنند، چه سرنوشتی در انتظار آنها است.

This newspaper writes that "don't think that this type of atrocities cause any kind of embarrassment or shame on the parts of those who rule Iran, including Ahmadinejad and Khamenie, on the contrary, conducting this types of brutal executions in public is part and parcel of the policy of Tehran's regime. They want to remind ordinary people, that if they are not obedient to those who rule them, this is the fate that they should be expecting.


یوتبوری پستن نوشت تصویر کلی از ایران تحت حاکمیت ملایان بسیار وحشتناک است. مثلا قردی که رابطه خارج از ازدواج داشته باشد، می تواند با حکم سنگسار روبرو شود. در این کشور زنان بشدت سرکوب می شوند. کودکان را اعدام می کنند. حتی روحانیون نیز از اعدام در امان نیستند. تظاهرات مسالمت آمیز سرکوب می شود و دانشجویان و روزنامه نگاران در سیاهچالها تحت وحشیانه ترین شکنجه ها قرار دارند.

Goteborg Posten writes, "A comprehensive depiction of the mullahs who rule Iran is incredibly horrifying". For example, those who have relations outside of the marriage, could be stoned to death. In Iran, women are ruthlessly suppressed, children are executed, even some of the clergies are not immune from execution. Peaceful demonstrations are viciously suppressed and students and journalists are thrown in the many dark dungeons of the regime and endure the most vile, savage and cruel tortures.--End Transliteration

A public display of hatred has only one purpose, to signal to the citizens of the state that their government is willing to kill anyone to stay in power. End this practice and you take away that power.

The one thing that the political left once believed about itself, true or not, was that it was "better" than the right -- because it cared more.
If what's not being reported on the Internet by the left these days is any indication, those days are gone. The compassion that once defined the left -- to itself anyway -- seems to have been discarded as useless baggage.

Read more!

Tuesday, July 31, 2007

Peres Says Ahmadinejad Worships Bomb over God

Haarezt: President Shimon Peres, in a radio interview on Monday, called Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad a "joke" and said he appeared to worship "the bomb more than he's worshipping the God in heaven."

Peres told U.S. National Public Radio in Jerusalem that a united front by the international community could stop Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons. Ahmadinejad has said Israel should be "wiped off the map" and recently forecast its destruction.

Peres said Ahmadinejad was "an unbelievable joke," adding the Iranian president "claims he's religious." "My impression is that in his eyes the nuclear bomb is higher than Allah, than the God in heaven. He's worshipping the bomb more than he's worshipping the God in heaven," Peres said.

Read more!

Wednesday, July 25, 2007

How Supreme is Iran's Supreme Turban?


Supremely Paranoid;
Photo from Economist

There is something quite important afoot, that bears paying attention to. Patrick Clawson and Mehdi Khalaji have co-authored an interesting piece in the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, which provides a rare insight into the internal power struggle between the two main factions of Islamic Republic's axis of power, the supremely paranoid Khamanei's faction (see "Men of Principle") and the capitalist/technocrat mullah Rafsanjani. It also looks like the democracy-hating *Heideggerian Crocodile (Ayatollah Mesbah Yazdi), spiritual leader of Ahmadinejad, counting the days to replace opium-smoking Supreme leader. Interesting note on the co-author of this article, Mehid Khalaji: Mehdi Khalaji has been a frequent contributor to the Assembly of Experts journal Hukumat-e Islami. In addition, assembly speaker Meshkini is a longtime friend of the Khalaji family. Long article but worthwhile. Here are some highlights:
Rafsanjani excels at turning obscure posts into power centers. As Majlis speaker in the 1980s, he became a central powerbroker between the feuding president (Khamenei) and prime minister (a post since abolished). Ayatollah Khomeini subsequently created the Expediency Council to resolve differences between the many power centers in Iran's complicated government structure, later enshrined in the constitution. Although the council was initially weak, it acquired a large, active staff and a new headquarters next to the Supreme Leader's offices once Rafsanjani stepped down as president in 1997 and was appointed council chair. Intriguingly, the council has the main say in what happens while the Supreme Leader's post is vacant, at least until the Assembly of Experts elects a new leader.

Rafsanjani took full advantage of his success in the December 2006 assembly election to assert himself on the national stage. In early 2007 -- a period when Ahmadinezhad was being criticized in the conservative press for endangering Iran's national unity and security by acting too combatively, and when reports were circulating of Khamenei's ill health (e.g., Fars News Agency stated that he was hospitalized briefly) -- Rafsanjani began acting as if he were the real powerbroker. In February, he made a widely publicized round of visits to top ayatollahs in Qom. Rumors flew that, in addition to seeking their general support, he was sounding them out about reducing Khamenei's power. Then, at the first meeting of the new assembly, he stated, "The Fourth Assembly of Experts could exercise its supervisory powers more than before."

Khamenei came roaring back, however, with several fire-breathing major addresses around the Nowruz spring equinox holidays. The Supreme Leader reaffirmed the hardline stance on the nuclear program and asserted that any talks with the West had to be conducted under his strict control.

What to Expect Next, and Implications for the West

If permitted to remain at the head of the Assembly of Experts, Rafsanjani would pose a persistent and open challenge to Khamenei. Accordingly, the assembly will likely meet soon to place a politically inactive senior cleric atop the assembly, such as Mohammad Imam-e Kashani, the Tehran Friday prayer leader. Even in that case, however, Rafsanjani's twin posts at the assembly and the Expediency Council give him a power base from which he can maneuver to limit or replace Khamenei.

In the event that Khamenei dies, the new Supreme Leader would most likely be a compromise candidate rather than either of the two polarizing figures said to want the post: Rafsanjani, a technocrat, and Ayatollah Muhammad Taqi Mesbah Yazdi, an extreme hardliner openly dismissive of democracy. The senior clerics, the Majlis, the technocracy, and the revolutionary power structure (i.e., the IRGC, Basij, and the foundations that control the economy) all share a common interest in a weak leader with limited ability to check them.

For the West, there are many advantages if Iran's leadership is weakened by internal disputes. Such an Iran would be busier domestically and therefore less able to concentrate on foreign adventures. It would also be more aware of its weaknesses and therefore more likely to compromise. To be sure, a weak Supreme Leader would presumably have less authority to impose difficult compromises on objecting factions. That, however, seems like a price worth paying in order to see a less powerful revolutionary leadership.


*Heidegger and Ayatollah Mesbah Yazdi

Read more!

Sunday, July 22, 2007

Three more student activists on hunger strike And Death Sentence for Two Iranian-Kurdish Journalists

UPDATE:
Iran:Jailed students on a hunger strike

City Boy: Saeed Derakhshan, Keyvan Ansari and Abolfazl Jahandar have joined the other three student activists Majid Tavakoli, Ahmad Ghassaban and Ehsan Mansouri who have been on hunger strike since last Saturday after two months and a half spent in Evin with no access to a lawyer or court hearing.









Campaign for supporting the Kurd Journalist Adnan Hassanpur and civic active Hiwa Butimar 7.18.2007 To support this campaign mail to the following addresses adnanhasanpoor@yahoo.com Kempainp@yahoo.com Or call to the following numbers: 0533193782

07701487582

07301164982

07301191592

07301094554

Read more!

Saturday, July 21, 2007

Islamic Republic of Iran

WARNING: GRAPHIC NATURE





Link of the original video in case dailymotion.com decides to remove the video

h/t to Winston

Three alleged killers being hung in Tabriz, NW of Iran. We have no way of knowing if they are political dissidents or are conveniently labeled as "murderers". The process of arriving at such verdict and the method by which the death sentence is carried out in Iran are highly suspect. The judiciary, legal system and courts, in general, in Mullah ruled Iran are absolutely dysfunctional. Two different people can be sentenced to two different punishments for exactly the same crime depending on how much each one is favored by those in charge of passing the sentence.
NO STATE THAT HAS A RELIGIOUS DOCRTINE CENTRAL TO ITS RIGHT TO GOVERN CAN HAVE HUMAN RIGHTS!
ANY RELIGION THAT NEEDS THE SUPPORT OF THE STATE CAN HAVE NO SPIRITUAL VALIDITY!
A CIVIL SOCIETY MUST SEPERATE VOTING AND WORSHIPING. ANYTHING LESS INSURES TYRANNY

Read more!

Tuesday, July 17, 2007

Iran Is Found To Be a Lair of Al Qaeda


I find this article particulary interesting because it matches the geographic location of what my friends who live in the city of Mashhad (Eastern Iran) have been telling me all along for over 4 years. They even mentioned a few citing of Osama himself in that city. I never really believed them until today. Some tid bits:


WASHINGTON — One of two known Al Qaeda leadership councils meets regularly in eastern Iran, where the American intelligence community believes dozens of senior Al Qaeda leaders have reconstituted a good part of the terror conglomerate's senior leadership structure.


That is a consensus judgment from a final working draft of a new National Intelligence Estimate, titled "The Terrorist Threat to the U.S. Homeland," on the organization that attacked the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001. The estimate, which represents the opinion of America's intelligence agencies, is now finished, and unclassified conclusions will be shared today with the public.
The classified document includes four main sections, examining how Al Qaeda in recent years has increased its capacity to stage another attack on American soil; how the organization has replenished the ranks of its top leaders; nations where Al Qaeda operates, and the status of its training camps and physical infrastructure...continue reading


Read more!

Ex-prisoner recalls Iran ordeal


A Frenchman who strayed into territorial waters spent 15 months locked up. His story is a rare glimpse of Tehran's legal system:


The fish weren't biting the morning of Nov. 29, 2005. Donald Klein, a 52-year-old German on vacation in Dubai in the United Arab Emirates, had hired Lherbier to take him on a fishing trip in the gulf. Looking for better prospects, they motored by the tiny island of Abu Musa, about 50 miles from both Iran and Dubai. There, they were stopped by a gray, unflagged military boat equipped with a .20-caliber machine gun. Placed under arrest, they were flown to the Iranian city of Bandar Abbas and held at a military base.For three days, their captors treated them politely and fed them well, although they could get no information and were not allowed to speak with each other, Lherbier said.

On the fourth day, Lherbier was awakened at 2 a.m. and taken to a room. The solidly built former factory worker was placed in a chair in a corner, facing the wall. He estimates there was silence for 15 minutes. Some people entered the room. Lherbier could not see faces as they began speaking in Persian to him.Suddenly, someone pinched the back of his neck very hard and began screaming into his ear.Lherbier thought he heard a gun cock. He winced in pain and cried for mercy. Everyone seemingly was speaking at once.Through the chaos, a voice spoke in English, the first words Lherbier had been able to understand since he was arrested."He wants to kill you," the voice told Lherbier. "He wants to cut your head off. And you can be sure that nobody will find your body."With that, the interrogations began.

The questioning lasted for hours over days, always starting after midnight. Officials drilled away, asking about Lherbier's family, his friends, his youth in the southern French city of Lyon, his military service in a special French mountain unit, his lifelong passion for the sea and his decision to gamble his life savings on a charter fishing business in the Persian Gulf.Interrogators accused him of being a spy, alleging that he worked for British intelligence. They said they knew he had been in Iraq twice for training, that Klein was a colonel and he a captain. The fishing business he started in Dubai earlier that year was a cover, the Iranians told him.After five days, a doctor came to examine Lherbier and Klein. Their captors said the ordeal was over — they could go.

They put the pair of them in a car and drove them off the base."It's been terrible," Klein whispered to Lherbier as they left. "But at least we'll be free now."Instead, the two men were taken to a different compound and locked inside windowless cells. Lherbier slept on a floor with filth and cockroaches, wrapping himself in a coarse, dirty blanket, trying to ignore the faint smell of chlorine. Silence stretched on for hours.In the night, the men were once again dragged to interrogations.Lherbier explained repeatedly that on his map, Abu Musa was marked as part of the United Arab Emirates. He said he was new to the gulf and didn't know the island was among several claimed by both countries. He wrote down answers on sheets of paper. His interrogators angrily ripped them up...continue reading

Read more!

Saturday, July 14, 2007

Ominous Signs of Rise of Military Dictatorship in Iran

This would be a second coup by the Ahmadinejad and his military oil mafia (IRGC) to hold on to power indefinitely. Robert Tait reports from Tehran:


Candidates in next year's Iranian parliamentary elections will be banned from displaying posters and banners, raising concerns over whether the poll will be free and fair.
Iran's fundamentalist-dominated parliament has passed a law severely restricting political advertising during campaigning for next March's election, which is expected to test the popularity of the Islamist president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, while measuring the pro-liberal reformist movement's ability to mount an electoral comeback amid increasing crackdowns on dissent.


In poor areas and remote places, nominees communicate with people primarily through pictures and posters," he told the centrist website, Aftab. "Why do the authorities expect people to trust them when they don't trust the people? They are tightening the media and information atmosphere by imposing various restrictions." Campaign photos have often played a key role in Iranian elections. The former reformist president, Mohammad Khatami, used portraits to make his face known before his landslide election triumph in 1997.

The success of Fatemeh Houshmand, a 25-year-old reformist, in topping the poll in last year's Shiraz city council elections was partly credited to campaign posters displaying her striking good looks.


Mr Ahmadinejad's supporters fared poorly in last December's nationwide council elections, prompting some analysts to forecast further reversals in the forthcoming parliamentary poll.There have already been complaints that widespread participation has been discouraged by rules requiring state and government workers to resign their posts eight months before polling day if they wanted to compete.
The council disqualified thousands of reformists from the 2004 parliamentary election, in which conservatives triumphed.


Last November I predicted that Ahamdinejad is positioning himself to oust the mullahs and capture the role of Supreme Leader (see here and here). True, Ahmadinejad and his military Junata (IRGC and Abadgran) had a set back in recent parliamentary election but it seems they have recouped and re-strategized and going for the ultimate kill.

More on IRGC' Connection to oil and gas industries here.

Meanwhile, our State Department thinks that they can make a back door deal with impotent and powerless Rafsanjani and it refuses to list the IRGC as a terrorist organization. *sigh

Read more!

A Discussion About stoning, Iranian revolution and cultural relativism


Below is a very important piece that addresses the "useful idiots'", the savvy (savage non-Iranian) Islamists' and in general racist cultural relativists' various amoral arguments:

Pleateau of Iran:


Some of you may have already heard that according to Islamic Republic judiciary spokesman Alireza Jamshidi in Tehran, the stoning of the man, Jafar Kiani, was carried out in a village in Qazvin province (northwestern Iran). This punishment was allegedly for commiting adultery.

As a result of this recent news, someone (a non-Iranian) made the following comment elsewhere. Note: the comment was not directed at me, but I did respond to the commentator. I want to focus on the content and nature of both the comment (not the person) and my response to it since I believe they are sufficiently important to republish them here:

The Comment:

“Again: Would you be outraged if Saddam Hussein was stoned???

Capital punishment whether it’s stoning, hanging, electrocution, or lethal injection is not torture. It may cause pain but that’s not the primary reason capital punishment is enforced. The primary reason is to put to death the criminal. Nice try but the issue is not whether someone values life more than marriage. You can value both. The issues are what is valued in a soceity, what crimes constitutes a capital offense and why?

Laws reflect and punishments for breaking those laws tell you what is valued in a soceity. Why shouldn’t adultery be a capital offense? Is adultery even wrong to you? Try not to name call when you answer the questions. I’m just asking. I don’t think anybody, outside of being a Christian, can give me a sound reason why adultery should not be a capital offense.

My Response:

You have raised some very interesting, but complex points as far as Iran under the ruling Mullahs is concerned.

1. Whether capital punishment, in general, should exist is debatable and I don’t think it is the sole issue here. Personally, I don’t believe in a death verdict/sentence for adultery.

2. Regardless of capital punishment and death sentence (as ultimate verdicts), the process of arriving at such verdict and the method by which the death sentence is carried out are equally important.

Are you aware that stoning prior to mullah rule was not part of the law in Iran? Bear in mind that I’m referring to 3000 year plus history of Iran, not just the Shah’s era. Do you also realize that the act of stoning is often performed by a group of people including children? Stoning is in fact torture which leads to death. It is a slow and painful death/execution. Stones used to hit the person must be of certain shape and size. Using big stones that can lead to instant death are against the Islamic law (sharia) in Iran.

Moreover, the basis for stoning a person is a ritual which is practiced by muslim pilgrims visiting Mecca. It is called “stoning of the Devil/Satan”. During this ritual, pilgrims must personally look for and gather appropriate shape/size stones, bring them back to an appropriate location and begin to throw them at a pretend-to-be devil as an act of denouncing and renouncing the Devil (Satan). However, there are vast differences between stoning a pretend-to-be-devil vs. a real person.

3. The judiciary, legal system and courts, in general, in Mullah ruled Iran are absolutely dysfunctional. Two different people can be sentenced to two different punishments for exactly the same crime depending on how much each one is favored by those in charge of passing the sentence. If stoning for adultery was to be applied across the board, then many of the ruling mullahs and their cohorts should have stoned to death long ago. Not to mention that many of the articles which currently exist in Islamic government constitution are not adhered to or are generally so vague and codified that one can interpret them any way one wants to and is expedient. They are highly subjective. Regardless, stoning, as a form of punishment for a capital offense, is actually mentioned in IR constitution including articles 83, 102 and 104.

4. “what is valued in a soceity, what crimes constitutes a capital offense and why?” Adultery is not valued in Iranian society, but nor is stoning. Stoning is valued and enforced by Mullahs in the society. There lies the difference. However, I don’t dispute that certain groups actually enjoy it such as: Bassij thugs and those who get their kicks out of torture and killing of others. I consider them sadists and mentally unstable i.e. psychotic.

5. How do we define adultery in Mullah ruled Iran? Have you heard of temporary marriage “seegheh”? Under sharia (Islamic law in Iran) with a few words, you can become temporarily married to someone for any period of time. Women often practice it due to economic/financial hardship. Even married women, whose husbands may be unable to provide for them and the family because of drug addiction (Iran has a very high percentage of drug addicts) can be temporarily married in order to feed their family and children. Of course, “seegheh” to me is not only a legalized form of prostitution, but it can also be construed as adultery. Men in current Iran can have 4 wives at the same time. Additionally, men can have up to 12 “seegheh” i.e. concubines. Traditionally, the practice of polygamy and “seegheh” - an arab/muslim practice - are frowned upon by the mainstream in Iran and never existed in Persian society or culture, certainly not prior to Islamic laws being enforced in the society and in people’s personal lives.

In conclusion, I think your reasoning, as far as mullah ruled Iran is concerned is rather simplistic. And, I hope you will find the above informative."

Also below I have selected a few sample of my previous posts regarding the amoral/racist/fascistic cultural relativist argument and their uninformed assertion about the Iranian revolution: This might seem repetitive to those who have been a long time reader of my blog. However, I think they're worth re-posting for my new readers who have shown interest in learning about Iran and the Iranian revolution and how it was hijacked by Khomein's thugs:

"Cultural relativists say Iranian society is Muslim, implying that people choose to live the way they are forced to. It's as if there are no differences in beliefs in Iran, no struggles, no communists, no socialists, and no freedom-lovers.

If so, why have 150,000 people been executed for opposing the Islamic Republic of Iran? If it’s the entire society's culture and religion, why does the Islamic regime need such extensive tools for repression? If it’s people’s beliefs, why does the regime control their private lives - from their sexual activities, to what video they watch, to what music they listen to?

If the entire society is Muslim, why did Zoleykhah Kadkhoda enter a voluntary sexual relationship for which she was buried in a ditch and stoned? If it is people's culture, why did the residents of Bukan revolt against the stoning and save her life? Why are thousands of women rounded up in the streets for “improper” veiling if its their culture and religion? How come, after two decades of terror and brutality, the universities are still not Islamic, according to an official of the regime? Though it's untrue, even if every person living in Iran had reactionary beliefs, it still wouldn’t be acceptable. If everyone believes in the superiority of their race, does that make it okay?

Cultural relativists say that we must respect people's culture and religion, however despicable. This is absurd and calls for the respect of savagery. Yes, human beings are worthy of respect but not all beliefs must be respected. If culture allows a woman to be mutilated and killed to save the family “honor,” it cannot be excused. In the Islamic Republic of Iran, religion rules and has become the mass murderer of people. If religion says that women who disobey should be beaten, that flogging is acceptable, and that women are deficient, it must be condemned and opposed"...more:

http://www.maryamnamazie.com/articles/cultural_relativism_fascism.html

Also Please read "Lost Wisdom" by Abbas Milani to realize that Iran was never run by Islamic laws (Sharia) despite its 1400 years of occupation by Islamist until the Islamic Republic took hold of Iran in the last 29 years.

http://www.amazon.com/Lost-Wisdom-Rethinking-Modernity-Iran/dp/0934211906


For the actual 3500 year history and culture I highly recommend Tom Holland’s “Persian fire : the first world empire and the battle for the West”.

http://www.amazon.com/Persian-Fire-First-Empire-Battle/dp/0385513119/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/103-1368292-5112658?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1173677731&sr=8-1

My plea to leftis liberals: For God's or humanity's sake stop politicizing human sufferings for your own political agenda and expediencey.

You can also read all my posts regarding Persian culture of 3000 plus years and not just the past 28 years:

http://fleetingperusal.blogspot.com/search/label/Persian%20Empire


Must read articles regarding the Iranian revolution:

http://www.democratiya.com/interview.asp?issueid=9

Janet Afary's piece on Iranain nation's struggle for democracy, dating back to 100 years ago:

"Janat Afary and Kevin Anderson give us glimpses into the 100-year old struggle of Iranians to gain democracy and liberty. A long and almost thoroughly researched article but well worth the read. Some highlights:


What went wrong? When reform-minded Iranians discuss this question, the conversation often turns to the 1906-11 Constitutional Revolution, widely seen as a missed opportunity for democratic modernization. This has been especially true in the past couple of years, as its centenary is celebrated by Iranians at home and abroad.


The Constitutional Revolution was the first democratic revolution to take place in the Middle East, and perhaps the most important. The revolution established a freely elected Parliament and a Constitution with civil liberties, severely limited the powers of the shah and promoted the establishment of women's schools and councils. It also set up a state-based judiciary that challenged the traditional authority of the Shiite clerics. As Yann Richard, France's leading Iran specialist, observes in his latest book L'Iran: Naissance d'une république islamique (Birth of an Islamic Republic), from the late eighteenth century through the mid-nineteenth century the Shiite clergy had provided a counterweight to the monarchy.

But with the emergence of two heterodox offshoots of Shiism in the mid-nineteenth century, Babism and Bahaism--both of which challenged social hierarchies, including gender inequality--the clerical establishment drew closer to the state in order to combat these dissident religious movements. When the Constitutional Revolution broke out, some influential clerics sided with the state; one of them, Sheikh Fazlullah Nuri, was executed by the revolutionaries. Yet the leading clerics were by no means united in opposition to the revolution: Quite a few embraced the changes, with some going so far as to endorse Nuri's execution.


As Hamid Dabashi recounts in Iran: A People Interrupted, this "revolution in the very moral fabric of a nation" was, like most later progressive movements in Iran, marked by the participation of its ethnic and religious minorities--Azeris, Armenians, Bahais and Jews. The revolution also saw an unprecedented flowering of Iranian literature. Hoping to build what Dabashi calls "an anti-colonial modernity," the great writer Ali Akbar Dehkhoda launched a campaign in the press against oppressive social customs (especially regarding gender). Socialist ideas from the 1905 Russian Revolution entered the country through Baku and Tbilisi... Much more

http://www.thenation.com/doc/20070716/afary

http://fleetingperusal.blogspot.com/2007/07/iranian-impasse.html

If you want to see what a stoning to death looks like, then click here. But be warned.

Also read, Potkin's reflections on Lenin and the recent stoning in Iran as a mother of three children awaits her scheduled stoning to be carried out by the savage Islamists.

Read more!

Thursday, July 12, 2007

Stratfor: If Iran is smart, it will cut a deal now


This observation from Stratfor (free stuff and subscription info here) might make for some interesting argument:


The seemingly never-ending nature of the war and the White House's my-way-or-the-highway policies appear to have broken the normally unbreakable portion of the Republican coalition -- national security conservatives. Of the 49 Republican senators, by Stratfor's count, five long ago left the president's camp on the issue of Iraq, and nine more have left within the last month -- seven of them this week alone. These are not dilettantes. Sens. Snowe, Hagel, John Sununu and Richard Lugar are part and parcel of the current generation's core U.S. defense thinkers. No president can simply ignore it when people like these run up the red flag.


While there obviously is a difference between disenchantment with Iraq policy and an all-out rebellion against presidential authority, Democrats and disaffected Republicans now hold 64 votes in the Senate -- tantalizingly close to the 67-seat, veto-proof, across-the-aisle coalition needed to bypass the president. (This 64-seat majority does not include erstwhile Democrat Sen. Joseph Lieberman.)The momentum is certainly against Bush, and -- barring a very impressive rabbit-from-the-hat trick -- domestic opinion about Iraq will be impossible to turn around.


In the meantime, the Iraqi government is clearly not on the verge of acting like a functional ruling body. And those opposed to a U.S.-Iranian deal -- especially foreign jihadists and other groups inside Iraq -- are sparing no effort to turn the region into a bloodbath.The bitter irony, as far as Bush is concerned, is that the ultimate rabbit -- a comprehensive deal with Iran over the future of Iraq that ends the war in as conclusive a manner as possible -- could actually end the Bush presidency as well and push that 64 up to 67.


Any initial U.S.-Iranian deal will require reining in rogue elements. Hence, even if things from this point on go swimmingly, the violence is certain to get worse before it gets better. Iran and the United States have been going back and forth for years over a potential Iraq settlement. At every turn, each has tested the other's nerve and attempted to appear tougher than it actually is.


The Iranians know that if they do not seal a deal soon, they might have to start from scratch, not only with a new U.S. administration but also with an administration intent on using national security issues to prove itself worthy of the public's trust. If Iran cannot get a deal soon, it might not get one at all -- and that sets the stage for possible Iranian concessions due to American weaknesses.


Release the hounds.

Read more!

Monday, July 02, 2007

Newsweek’s Michael Hirsh’s Pro-Iranian Distortions Endanger America

By RoxieAmerica

Michael Hirsh, a senior editor at Newsweek, wrote an article entitled, “Time for a Time Out -- Iran Has a Message. Are We Listening?” (Source ) Michael Hirsh sees Iran though the tainted lense of anti-Bush glass clouded by a concrete wall of denial concerning Iran’s long history of creating Instability.

Point 1: Quoting Newsweek: “Bush's feeble $75 million effort to promote democracy in Iran also is not gaining traction. While much of the Western media in recent weeks have focused on the detention of four Iranian Americans who made the mistake of traveling back to their homeland at a time when the government is even more paranoid than usual about American plots, they scarcely make news in Tehran. Indeed, the Bush program's most notable impact has been giving the regime justification for a new crackdown on dissent.”

Mr. Hirsh falsely displays Iran’s press as a barometer. The reality is: the Iranian press can not use any source except Iranian government approved sources. Some topics simply can not be discussed in the press. Iran has shut down newspapers that print real news. Iran has even shut down blogs. To compare western media to Iranian media, then use the result to be critical of President Bush, is completely inaccurate and reflects only Mr. Hirsh’s prejudice, not the actual situation.

Point 2: Quoting Newsweek: “It is this impression of inevitably clashing interests that Rezai was trying hard to dispel. He pointed out that his is the only country that can help Washington control Shiite militias in Iraq, slow the Taliban resurgence in Afghanistan and tame Hezbollah's still-dangerous presence in Lebanon all at once. "If America pursues a different approach than confronting Iran, our dealings will change fundamentally," he said.”Quoting Newsweek: “And what of other overlapping interests? Let's start with Iraq, the one area where Washington does seem to acknowledge it needs Tehran's help, even as the administration continues to accuse Iran of delivering sophisticated makeshift bombs to Iraqi militants. Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki's Shiite-dominated government "is of strategic importance to us," Rezai said. "We want this government to stay in power. Rival Sunni countries oppose Maliki. We haven't." It also stands to reason that in Afghanistan, Lebanon and the new "Hamastan" in Gaza -- all places where Tehran wields enormous influence -- an Iran that is encouraged to play a broader regional security role could become more cooperative.”

Mr. Hirsh paints a picture of Tehran being able to save the world from groups like Hezbollah, Hamas, and Shiite Iraq Insurgents but fails to tell readers that Iran has armed and trained these groups. Even worse, he paints the picture to appear as if Iran is not providing those weapons. It is like defending the New York City gangsters selling protection by saying they one should not accuse them of destroying businesses, but rather accept their blackmail because they can control the street gangs causing the destruction – in reality the street gangs were the gangsters. Mr. Hirsh wrongly and dangerously paints the Iranian gangsters exporting their violent revolution as the good guys.

Point 3: “Of course, the elephant in the room is Iran's toxic relationship with Israel, especially President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's denial that the Holocaust happened and his threats toward a U.S. ally. But several Iranian officials hinted that Ahmadinejad crossed a red line in Iranian politics when he pushed his rhetoric beyond the official hope that Israel would one day disappear to suggest that Tehran might help that process along.”

Mr. Hirsh presents the devil of Iran as a fluke, a rarity and not a reflection of Iranian policy. Mr. Hirsh fails to point out that it was Iran’s Supreme Leader who first said Israel should be wiped off the map. He fails to point out that Iranians have been bussed into demonstrations for three decades where they shout, “death to Israel.” Most important, Mr. Hirsh does not point out that the Iranian Constitution demands Iranians continue to export their Islamic Revolution around the world. Instead, Mr. Hirsh deceives Americans and the world by making it appear as if President Ahmadinejad is some rare exception.

Conclusion: Nothing Mr. Hirsh writes as Iranian “news’ for Newsweek can be believed. It is tainted with prejudice for a nation lead by very dangerous religious extremists and prejudice against the Bush Administration.

Mr. Hirsh represents a danger to America and the world by his highly biased reckless reporting. Mr. Hirsh is not writing news stories; he is writing Iranian propaganda.To the issue of the “Time-Out:” Time-outs are for children who misbehave.

The subject of Mr. Hirsh’s interview is under indictment for terrorism in South America. Iran is the largest nation-sponsor of terrorism. Iran is not Iraq. Iran is terrorism incorporated. Mr. Hirsh advocates letting terrorists continue their uranium enrichment even though Iran supplies high-tech and very dangerous weapons to terrorists in multiple nations.

Mr. Hirsh wouldn’t know the enemy in the war on terror if the enemy had the word “terrorist” on their forehead. Mr. Hirsh also fails to point out that Tehran’s goal in sponsoring terrorism is to create a one-world Islamic government. He fails to point out that the Islamic revolutionaries in Iran believe it is their duty to Allah to use any means to impose this Islamic world-order on the world.

Mr. Hirsh’s article provides aid and comfort to known terrorists. It moves the world closer to nuclear terrorism.Abraham Lincoln said, “I may not know much, but I know right from wrong.” Mr. Hirsh clearly calls evil good and good evil. I stand with Abraham Lincoln. A terrorist is not a misunderstood person in need of a time out. A terrorist is an evil person. If evil people got better by talking to them, then nations would not need jails. It is time to stop calling evil good. It is also time to quit misleading the American people about terrorists.

Read more!

Thursday, June 28, 2007

Islamic Republic= Shia Al-Qaeda




Condoleezza Rice has emerged as the Bush administration's most effective advocate for a policy of diplomatically engaging (code for appeasing) supposed moderate Islamists, including members of the murderous Muslim Brotherhood, Hitlerian Hamas, torture-loving Taliban, and the nuclearizing, turbaned tyrants of Iran.

Only Al Qaeda remains outside the pale of possible engagement--for the time being. The appeasement-prone State Department is open to the concept of luring an array of "Al Qaeda associated and influenced" operatives....Obsessed with her idiotic ideas regarding "transformational diplomacy," Rice is working overtime to persuade President Bush that there are democratic-leaning Islamists across the Middle East and the Muslim world. Her arguments resonate in influential circles, including the Council on Foreign Relations, America's most influential think tank. Foreign Affairs, which the CFR publishes, has commissioned several articles in favor of "accommodating" alleged moderate Islamists.

If Condi cannot see that the Islamic Republic is the Shia Al-Qaeda (perhaps even more cunning and with more cash flow), then we are all doomed.


In the meantime, Hillary Clinton thinks that the Bush administration has been given Iran "six years of the silent treatment."


Source

Read more!

Shame on Thai government!


AFP/File Photo: Iranian
cartoonist Marjane Satrapi
poses during a photo
call for her animated
film 'Persepolis' in the...

BANGKOK (AFP) - Award-wining Iranian film "Persepolis" has been dropped from line-up at the 2007 Bangkok International Film Festival after pressure from the Iranian embassy, organisers said Wednesday

The film, which jointly won the Jury Prize at the Cannes film festival in May, was scheduled to screen on the opening night of the 10-day festival in the Thai capital, which begins July 19.
"We have withdrawn Persepolis ... on the request of the Iranian embassy," said Chattan Kunjara Na Ayudhaya, public relations director at the Tourism Authority of Thailand, which hosts the festival.

Iranian embassy officials confirmed that they had asked organisers to drop the animated black-and-white film, which tells the story of a young girl growing up in revolutionary Iran.

The film, based on comics by its co-director Marjane Satrapi, recounts the downfall of the shah followed by the imposition of Islamic law after the 1979 revolution, seen through the eyes of an eight-year-old.

She grows into an outspoken teenager and is sent away to Austria to avoid clashes with the authorities.

A cultural officer at the Iranian embassy in Bangkok told AFP they believed the film portrayed a bad image of their country.

"They tried to make Iranian people sad and upset with the Islamic revolution, which is not true," said Mohammad, who gave only one name.

"We appreciate that the Thai organisers understand, and now we are trying to introduce other good award-winning Iranian films," he added.

Read more!

Monday, June 18, 2007

Iranian Opposition & Solidarity - Paris Conference Updates (3)

Reprinted from Iranian Plateau:

Updated (2): I just found this article - June 15, 2007 - it mentions the names of a few people who were to attend the conference - here is an extract:
“What we want to do at this stage is to evaluate our potentials for continuing the struggle, set up two coordinating committees, one for Europe and another one for the United States to bring together all Iranians opposed to this regime and eventually, forming an Iranian government in exile”, one of the organizers told Iran Press Service.

Among the participants are well-known leftist activists, such as Kambiz Rousta and Dr. Hassan Massali, who opposed the former Shah and for years have been vilified by the monarchist camp.

Sitting next to them will be conservative former monarchists such as Mr. Shahriar Ahi, an advisor to Prince Reza Pahlavi, University Professor Dr. Shahin Fatemi, or Dr. Cyrus Amouzegar, a former government minister under the shah. Also at the table will be Mohsen Sazegara, a confidant of Ayatollah Rouhollah Khomeini who helped to found the dreaded Revolutionary Guards but who broke with the regime in the late 1980s and was jailed repeatedly and tortured because of his calls for change and Ali Afshari, a former students leader.

“Some groups can’t accept the new political realities that require reaching across party lines, and have said they will not come”, said Baqerzadeh. “But we are not closing the door”, he added.
However, some of the participants are skeptic: “Belief in factors like democracy, political and individual freedom in a country with huge and complicated problems like Iran is not enough. The present Iranian society, the young and women who makes 70 per cent of Iran’s population have a different interpretation for freedom, especially the freedom of the individual”, observed Ahmad Ra’fat, a journalist who often talks to Iranian students and women activists in Iran observed.

“What Iranians outside are fighting for is quite different from what Iranians inside the country wants”, he noted in an article posted by “Gooya”, the most popular Iranian internet website.

Addressing the Democracy and Security International Conference that was held in Prague on 5 and 6 June 2007 and at which appeared President George Bush, Mr. Pahlavi appealed to all democratic governments of the world, especially to the Europeans for solidarity with the people of Iran against a common enemy: Islamist preachers of intolerance who turn young men and women into walking bombs, shouting death to America, death to Israel, death to whosoever resists their murderous ideology.

“To the realpolitik cynics who say Islamist theocracy is a reality we have to live with, I respond: funny – they never said they can live with YOU! To those who say the theocrats can reform if we are nice to them, I say you do not know the difference between Islamist revolution and secular ones. Those who believe they speak with the absolute authority of Allah demand absolute submission”. SOURCE HERE

Updated (3): June 18, 2007 - For those who are able to read Persian (Farsi) - please visit this website for more detailed information & recommendations regarding Paris Solidarity Conference - Neshast-e London
You can also read the latest round up of this historic 3 day conference in English by Kenneth R. Timmerman - Iranian Opposition Vows to Step Up Fight Against Tehran
Key parts of Timmerman’s round up:
One of those former opponents of the shah, Kambiz Roosta, helped to organize the Paris conference. A prominent socialist in his youth, Roosta helped devise the Solidarity Iran formula of connecting domestic opposition groups and social groups to their counterparts outside Iran.
Solidarity Iran is different from other Iranian opposition groups in that it is not a political party, nor does it represent a particular ideology.

“It allows the various groups and political parties to keep their identity, with individual leaders joining Solidarity Iran in a personal capacity,” said Iman Foroutan, another member of the newly-elected coordinating council.

Foroutan, who runs the California-based Iran of Tomorrow Movement, has been recruiting cells of activists inside Iran. “The idea is to come up with a grand plan of civil disobedience and economic action that will allow people to go out and do their own thing, while coordinating all these actions,” he said.

Messages of support for the new movement came pouring in over the weekend from activists inside Iran.

Ibrahimi read a letter sent by more than a dozen political prisoners in Iranian jails, who asked that their names be read aloud, even though they knew they would be punished for it.
Mohsen Zarafzadeh, who fled Iran after he was released from jail a few years ago, read a similar letter of support from jailed student leader Hesmatollah Tabarzadeh.

A prominent women’s activist inside Iran connected to a friend at the conference through a special computer program that allows users to talk over the Internet without detection. “She said she was willing to serve on the newly-elected Coordinating committee,” the friend said.

Kian Sanjari, a well-known Iranian blogger who was forced to flee Iran recently and is currently hiding in a neighboring country, called on a cellphone to see if he could connect as well, to post portions of the speeches on his blog.

The 20-member coordinating council, elected this Sunday, will meet in the near future to select a seven-member Executive Committee, as well as a working group to hammer out a new national compact with Iran’s ethnic minorities.

Hamza Bayezid, the representative of Congress of Nationalities for a Federal Iran, said his 16 member organizations will wait until the details of the national compact can be negotiated before formally joining the new movement.
In an exclusive interview just after the conference ended, the deputy secretary general the Kurdish Democratic Party of Iran told NewsMax that the Congress was hopeful the negotiations would be successful.

While some Iranian nationalist organizations feared the ethnic Kurds and other minorities wanted to separate from Iran, Dr. Hassan Sharafi told NewsMax that his party and the Congress of Nationalities were dedicated to a united Iran.
“We are Iranian nationalists,” he said. “We want our rights within a federal Iran. Splitting apart Iran is to nobody’s benefit.”

Read more!

Wednesday, June 13, 2007

What King, What Traitor?

Nooshabeh Amiri:

When we were first year students, we knew little about 16 of Azar [December 7, Iran’s Student Day]. We also knew some general things about Iran’s past and the blood that had been shed, which was enough to motivate us to break a few windows, chant slogans and join others in their marches. My late professor’s famous poem was ingrained in each and every one of our minds: “if you stand up, if I stand up…”

The university cafeteria’s power suddenly went out and the windows began to shatter. It was a while before I mustered enough courage to throw a glass in the dark. Perhaps no one heard the sound of that glass breaking, except for the one who threw it: me. That was enough to make me afraid. I got up, ran in the dark, climbed the stairs, and suddenly: confrontation. I was standing in front of Dr. Aligholi Ardalan, the gray-haired dean of the university – and, of course, “one of the Shah’s tools,” (as we accused every official back then). In one second I imagined myself in prison, going through interrogation… but Dr. Ardalan gently said, “Please calm down, my dear. The officers are upstairs. They will know everything if they see you like this. Calm down. Go.”
I did not believe it. But there was something in Dr. Ardalan’s friendly and fatherly voice that calmed me down. As if mechanically, I asked, “Should I go?” He shook his head quietly and gently tapped me on the back. Many others left too on that day. Dr. Ardalan was standing on the university’s entrance steps, yelling at security officers, “Stay out of it, it’s over… It is 16 of Azar for God’s sake!”

The next morning I returned to the university. The rioting was over, all because of the wisdom of a man who understood youth and passion. Perhaps there were not many like Dr. Ardalan; because if there were, those small glass breakings would not have spread onto the streets and target the government.

I recalled this event to make a reference to what is going on today. Today, Ehsan Mansouri, Abbas Hakimzadeh, Ali Saberi, Babak Zamanian, Ahmad Ghassaban, Majid Tavakoli, Pouyan Mahmoudian, Meghdad Khalilpour, Majid Sheikhpour and many others of our students are behind bars and are being tortured.


Today, they drag Ehsan Mansouri out of his house and beat him so severely that the only thing they can then is to send him to the notorious Evin prison’s clinic Today, many mothers know what is being done to their children. Today’s university is run by people who only a little while ago were prepared to imprison any child of this land.

Let us ponder for a moment: there was a man like Ardalan in that system, but they still called the Shah “a traitor;” there were no *“starred” students but the Shah was still called “a traitor;” security officers did not sexually harass women in universities, but the Shah was still called “a traitor;” a para-military and security organization did not operate inside the universities under the guise of a student group, but the Shah was still called “a traitor.”

Tomorrow, what will they call those who do such things today?

And a final point. In tomorrow’s Keyhan newspaper its pro-regime editor Mr. Shariatmadari will probably write that “Rooz” is advocating for monarchy. The readers must be wise, especially when someone who is not yet a king acts like one. What really matters is for Ehsan and others to know that our eyes are wet with tears. We can’t sleep because of their pain. As for those who have made us suffer this pain and are able to sleep themselves – well, they have not heard the bad news yet.

This Video is dedicated to all Tehran Amir Kabir Polytechnic University active students in jail or still in university, who risk their lives on day to day basis against the violent dictatorship they live in.(Link via City Boy)

*Iran's "starred" students - politically active university students barred from continuing with their studies .

Read more!

Tuesday, June 12, 2007

Narcoislam in Iran


From Yellow dog in Iran:


I was sitting on a domestic flight from Tehran when a man sat next to me, a middle aged grizzly Basiji Haj Agha, bearded, scruffy type wearing the usual uniform of the Islamic Republic's armed thuggery. At first I was very scared and was asking myself what the hell is this smelly guy sitting next to me, what have I done wrong, these guys usually have their own special seatings if not their own airplanes, but then I settled in and realized this must be just happening by chance and anyway what could I do now when the plane is about to depart and anyway I have not committed any "crime".


Before and after the plane took off I noticed the Haj Agha chit chatting on his mobile phone/walkie-talkie. The flight attendant told him to turn off the phone but the man would every two minutes pick up and say some thing in there. I opened the conversation by asking him if he was going to visit family and he said he was going to visit his factory and will be back in Tehran next day. I asked about his factory and eventually led to him mentioning that he was a Sardar (General) of the Pasdaran and dealt with narcotics smuggling, now I do not know if he was saying the truth for a fact, but he was wearing uniform and by his looks I could imagine he had no problem killing a few infidels for the day.


I started talking about the misery of addiction I see everyday on streets and how many friends and relatives I know who are suffering from addiction and that families are being torn and destroyed by drugs. He told me everyday the problem is getting worse and started laying the blame on the wealthier parts of the population that started making Cocaine fashionable and now there is a huge Crack problem across Iran, and then there is Methamphetamine known as (Shisheh) beginning to make an impact and of course heroin and opium is nothing new.


I asked him what is being done to stop the flow of drugs and fix the problem, he said nothing can be done. He explained that it happens every week that they confiscate a trailer truck filled with heroin and opium in the east of the country, typically in Zahedan where they impound the vehicle and imprison the driver and then the following week they confiscate the same trailer with the same cargo on the western border of Iran, typically Bazargan border crossing to turkey.


He was very comfortable to say that the government is accommodating the drug trade and he blamed the huge demand in Western Europe for the problem in Iran, he said the reason drugs are so cheap in Iran is that the drug traffickers are financing the transportation of the drugs to Europe, by selling parts of the shipments cheap in order to give a cut to officials or people in powerful positions who can pull strings. The Haj Agha continued to chat on his phone despite many warning from flight attendants and after we landed I said goodbye to the Haj Agha who seemed to like the conversation with me and asked for my phone number (this made me comically feel uncomfortable in many ways), of course I gave him a number where he could not reach me and when we got off the plane there were couple of other Haj Aghas waiting for him at the foot of the plane and he disapeared into the crowd.


I hope he cannot find me, I was not in my assigned seat, just as a precaution I will have a supply of Vaseline close by.Afterwards I thought hard if I should publish this post or not. I felt the impulse to do so just to open a window although limited, into the way things work in Iran, how we have regressed and how helpless the people are under a corrupt and totalitarian regime that has no aim than the hateful destruction of a nation and of families and to enrich themselves by any means.


Now Iran has the highest rate of addiction in the world, there are reports of more than twenty million addicts in Iran, HIV infection is spreading like a wild fire. I think it is about time an investigation is done of the Iranian clerical establishment and its involvement in the narcotics trafficking. It has been said that the ubiquitous Rafsanjani family and also Ayatollah Vaez-Tabasi or otherwise know as the King of Khorasan are deeply involved in the drug trade, which not only includes trafficking and production in Iran, it also may very likely include production in parts of Afghanistan. Members of these drug cartels must be prosecuted and punished for crimes against humanity.

Read more!