Showing posts with label crimes of Islamic Republic of Iran. Show all posts
Showing posts with label crimes of Islamic Republic of Iran. Show all posts

Monday, April 21, 2008

Room for Three???

The American-Saudi-Iranian "understanding" in Iraq:

Iran's support for al-Hakim and Sadr, prior to and after the war, eventually had to reach the point of making preferences, especially at such a critical period. The upcoming provincial council elections will determine the future of Southern Iraq and the relationship of the periphery to the central authority. It is in Iran's interest for al-Hakim to wield influence in this region which borders Iran. However, if the Mahdi Army wins the elections, which is highly probable, and continues to maintain its position unchanged, Iran will lose its long-term bet on a weak and divided Iraq. Moreover, even if al-Sadr himself supported federalism, his Movement would suffer divisions as it is constituted of diverse groups, some with Arabist and others with Islamist orientations. Consequently, this explains the repeated official and American announcements that al-Sadr is not personally targeted and that all he needs to do is to lift the political cover off al-Mahdi Army and become involved in the political process.

Biden managed to win congressional approval for his plan to partition Iraq. The new Iraqi Army, in cooperation with the militia of al-Hakim and US forces, started the implementation phase in Basra. Iran, on the other hand, awaits the opportunity to reap the gains and will have no qualms over sacrificing al-Sadr and his friendship.

Read more!

Tuesday, March 11, 2008

Arrested in brothel with six prostitutes

Wow. Eliot Spitzer ain't got nothin' on this guy. He must be making tons of money...

Gateway pundit has more. This idiot was in charge of last year's crackdown on immodesty.

Read more!

Friday, November 16, 2007

Hillary and the Islamic Republic


Kamangir: General Prosecuting Attorney, Cleric Dorri Najafabadi, issued a letter blaming the administration for their lack of strict control over Iranian students abroad.


According to Roozonline [Persian], the letter advocates for a decision made earlier for creating Islamic councils in foreign universities, as well as secret surveillance of the students in order to discover and persecute those who “act in contrary to the national security and the Islamic identity”.


The letter also emphasizes on more sever actions, including making students barred from getting back to the country. The letter demands the authorities to reply rapidly on how they have acted in this regard.
Rooz writes, “Currently, 70,000 Iranian students study abroad, most of whom are not supported by grants from the Islamic Republic. Ahmadinejad tried to decrease this number as soon as he took the power”. The author calls these measures “Exporting the second cultural revolution abroad”.--


I think the IR and their cronies in the US are already laying the ground work for establishing such Islamic Organizations in American universities if Hillary Clinton is elected to be the President in 2008. Hillary being a foreign policy *realist* is ready to straddle the fence on the Islamic Republic.

Read more!

Monday, September 24, 2007

In Iran, "It's the Ideology, Stupid"

Excellent article:

IHT:
TEHRAN: When Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was first elected president, he said that Iran had more important issues to worry about than how women dress. He even called for allowing women into soccer games, a revolutionary idea for revolutionary Iran.

Today, Iran is experiencing the most severe crackdown on social behavior and dress in years, and women are often barred from smoking in public, let alone from attending a public event in a stadium.

Since coming to office two years ago, Ahmadinejad has grabbed headlines around the world and in Iran for outrageous statements that often have no more likelihood of implementation than his soccer plan. He generated controversy in New York last week by asking to visit the site of the destroyed World Trade Towers - a request that was denied - and by agreeing to speak at Columbia University on Monday.

But it is because of his provocative remarks, like denying the Holocaust and calling for Israel to be wiped off the map, that the United States and Europe have never known quite how to handle the firebrand president, say politicians, officials and experts in Iran.

In demonizing Ahmadinejad, they say, the West has served him well, elevating his status at home and across the region at a time when he is increasingly isolated politically because of his go-it-alone style and ineffective economic policies.

Political analysts here are surprised at the degree to which the West focuses on their president, saying the denunciations reflect a general misunderstanding of their system. Unlike in the United States, say, the Iranian president is not the head of state nor the commander in chief. That status is held by Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the supreme leader, whose role combines civil and religious authority. At the moment, this president's power comes from two sources, they say: the unqualified support of the supreme leader, and the international condemnation he manages to generate when he speaks up.

"The United States pays too much attention to Ahmadinejad," said a political scientist who spoke on the condition of anonymity for fear of reprisal. "He is not that consequential."

That is not to say that Ahmadinejad is insignificant. He controls the mechanics of civil government, much the way a prime minister does in a state like Egypt, where the real power rests with the president. He manages the budget and has put like-minded people in positions around the country, from provincial governors to prosecutors. His base of support is the Basiji militia and elements of the Revolutionary Guards.

But Ahmadinejad has not shown the same political acumen at home as he has in riling the West. Two of his ministers have quit, criticizing his stewardship. The head of the central bank resigned. The chief judge criticized him for his management of the government. His promise to root out corruption and redistribute the nation's oil wealth has run up against entrenched interests.

Even a small bloc of members of Parliament that were once aligned with him have largely given up, dissolving a small caucus they had formed in his support, officials said.

Rather than focusing so much attention on the president, the West needs to learn that in Iran, what matters is ideology - Islamic revolutionary ideology, according to politicians and political analysts here. Nearly 30 years after the shah fell in a popular rebellion, Iran's supreme leader also holds the title of "Guardian of the Revolution." Ahmadinejad's power stems not from his office per se, but from the refusal of his patron, Khamenei, and some hard-line leaders to move beyond Iran's revolutionary identity, which makes full relations with the West impossible.

There are plenty of conservatives and hard-liners who take a more pragmatic view, wanting to retain "revolutionary values" while integrating Iran with the world, at least economically. But they are not driving the agenda these days, and while that could change it will not be the president who makes the call.

"Iran has never been interested in reaching an accommodation with the United States," the political scientist said. "It cannot reach an accommodation as long as it retains the current structure."

There is another important factor that restricts Ahmadinejad's hand: While ideology defines the state, the revolution has allowed a particular class to grow wealthy and powerful.

When Ahmadinejad was elected, it appeared that hard-liners had a monopoly on all the levers of power. But today it is clear that Ahmadinejad is not a hard-liner, not in the traditional sense. His talk of economic justice and a redistribution of wealth, for example, ran into a wall of existing vested interests, including powerful clergy and military leaders...

Read more!

Thursday, August 30, 2007

IRI Threatens Families of the victims of the September Massacre of 1987



Every year for the past 18 years, families of the victims of 1987-88 bloody massacre (mostly young girls and boys) of Iran's political prisoners, ordered by genocidal Khomeini , have gathered around an arid and desolate piece of land near Khavaron district in Tehran to pay homage to their loved ones.

These heroes were unflappable in their quest for justice and liberty. They did not cower or shrink from their ideals at the hands Khomeini's psychopathic religious thugs. Make no mistake, they did not die in vain. Their stories are yet to be told and discovered by future generations.

Mothers and fathers who lost their sons and daughters weep at unknown graves. Children who never got to know their parents, place flowers and sing the anthems their parents sang before they were executed. Below, Watch the video clip from years past.

http://www.khavaran.com/Films/Khavaranweb.wmv

This year, however, which marks the 19th anniversary of the mass executions, the families and friends of the victims have been threatned and warned by the Islamic Republic Intelligence officers (read goons and thugs) not to gather at the site in rememberance of their loved ones .




Almost, 19 years have passed but the pain remains fresh for many of those who are still mourning at the unmarked and non-existence and imaginary graves of their sons and daughters, fathers, and mothers. The subject is still taboo in Iranian press and no official has yet been brought to justice for this crimes against humanity.

How was this grave site discovered?

The public became alerted of the mass graves only when they noticed large gathering of over enthusiastic stray dogs, scavenging for bones. The exact number of those who were executed is unknown. The estimates are around 30,000.



This massive extermination of dissidents was done within a period of one month. (see my previous post).


You can find some of the victims names --the list is still being compiled since the whereabouts of many others are still unknown.

If you did not already know (or somehow forgot), you may learn that firing on bound and blindfolded captives, especially teenagers and pregnant women, is an Islamic pastime and a virtue (if not a turn-on!), in short an integral part of the new-found pride in Iranian revolutionary identity. According to one of the survivors of this massacre, Iraj Mesdaghi, author of the book "Neither life or Death" many true believers signed up to become 'the executioners' and 'the torturers' in order to do "Allah's will". The list of volunteer torturers and executioners was so long that they had to wait in a waiting list.

You can also visit Omid Cyber Memorial for the names of more victims of the Holy crimes of the Islamic Republic of Terrorists.

At present, there are thousands of political prisoners in Iran, being tortured and are in imminent danger of being executed.
photos and materials from Potkin's and Nana's blog.

Read more!

Sunday, August 19, 2007

Nassarallah's interview with the Iranian TV was censored !

photo: https://hamdami.com/MFAFA



سانسور سخنان سرکرده حزب الله برای جلوگيری از خشم مردم لبنان

Censorship of Nassrallah's interview with the Islamic Republic's state TV to prevent the anger of Lebanese people.


نصرالله در این بخش از سخنان خود صریحا اعتراف کرد که یک عامل و دست نشانده حکومت ایران است و دستورات تهران را اجرا می کند.بیژن نوباوه گزارشگر تلویزیون دولتی ایران که این مصاحبه را انجام داد، به سانسور بخشی از سخنان نصرالله اعتراف کرد و گفت: دبیرکل حزب الله در این بخش از سخنان خود گفت: ما حاضریم پاره پاره شویم و هزاران تکه گردیم تا ایران عزیز بماند.


Hassan Nassrallah in an interview with the national Iranian TV, explicitly admitted that he is an element and he is a vassal of the Islamic Republic of Iran and executes Tehran's orders. Bijan Nobaveh, the reporter of the state-run TV who did the interview with Nassrallah, admitted to censoring part of the Nassarallah's interview with him and said:" Nassraallh said: "we are ready to be torn into thousands pieces so the Dear Iran can survive.



زیرا اگر ایران عزیز بماند ما هم عزیزخواهیم ماند. من سرباز حقیر امام خمینی هستم. جوانان حزب الله به نام امام خمینی جنگیدند و از امام حسین یاری جستند و تبرکات خود را بر مردم ایران نثار کردند.علت آن که تلویزیون دولتی ایران این سخنان را سانسور کرد آن بود که نصرالله در آن صریحا اعتراف می کند که یک عامل و دست نشانده حکومت ایران است که نه به خاطر عظمت وطن خویش لبنان، بلکه در راه حکومت ایران عمل می کند. نصرالله با این سخنان عملا اعتراف می کند که این جنگ، جنگ ملت لبنان نبود، بلکه جنگ رژیم ایران بود و او دستورات ایران را در لبنان اجرا می کند و اقداماتش برای تامین منافع حکومت ایران است.


Because if dear Iran survives, we will remain dear too. We are all little soldiers of Imam Khomeini. The youth of Hizballah fought in the name of Imam Khomeini and they sought the assistance of Imam Hossein and they gave the Iranian people the blessing....He also said this was not Lebanoan's war but it was the war of the Iranian regime...

Read more!

Friday, August 17, 2007

Feds pay $80,000 over anti-Bush T-shirts


In the United States if you wear an anti-Bush T-shirt, you'll be awarded $80,000 in court. In Iran, if you wear, speak, think or write anything anti-Islamic Republic, you'll be arrested and sent to Evin-prison's "suite 209".

http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2007/08/16/feds_pay_80000_over_anti_bush_t_shirts/

Read more!

Friday, August 10, 2007

Media Check-USA



Media Check-USA
August 09, 2007





As more and more American troops in Iraq are being disintegrated, vaporized and blown to bits by Iranian-made munitions, the pathetic hand-wringing in the USA about "Iranian interference" in Iraq has led only to useless and counter-productive ambassadorial charades of "regional security conferences" between the US and the cynical Iraq-based mouthpieces of the criminal regime that has terrorized the entire nation of Iran since 1979. In the meantime, the near-complicity of the US media in perpetuating the status quo in Iran has led to the nearly absolute ignorance of the American public concerning true state of worsening subjugation and oppression that the Iranian citizens have been suffering under since the most recent "election" in Iran. . And here is the rest of it.Since the former alleged interrogator, torturer, executioner and hit-man for Khomeini has been installed as "president" in Iran, the elevation in power and stature of the most murderous henchmen in the regime to positions of judges, intelligence chiefs and ministers has only widened the oppression and terror that the freedom-loving people of Iran have had to suffer under. However, this fact and the overall falsehood of any semblance of truly democratic elections in Iran has been withheld from the American public by a media that seems more concerned with avoiding any reporting on the domestic situation in Iran that might endanger their access to visas for their reporters to enter Iran for "exclusive" first-hand reporting.

CNN, ABC and even Fox News have been notably irresponsible in their coverage of the domestic governmental terror in Iran that has prevented any form of political dissent from being covered in the USA press. In the meantime, brave and conscientious Iranian journalists and political opponents are being arrested, tortured and secretly executed for attempting to let the truth be known about the Islamic Fourth Reich and its Islamic Revolutionary Gestapo. While CNN has been relentless in its efforts to blacken the Bush administration's attempts to bring truly democratic elections to Iraq, it has been virtually mute on the lack of any political discourse or freedom that preceded the most recent "presidential elections" in Iran.

It's preening and coddling of Ahmadinejad as a valued pet thorn in the side of President Bush has led to virtually no coverage of the widespread arrests, executions and disappearances of hundreds of thousands of political opponents to the criminal regime in Tehran. The only coverage of domestic unrest in Iran has been the airing of the "confessions" of the unfortunate Iranian-American citizens provided by the Islamic Republic or the supposedly "candid" bazaar interviews conducted under the watchful eyes of government agents wherein Iranian citizens claim that all is well in Iran except for the oppressive "effects of US-led sanctions" against their government. While Christian Annanpour has been to virtually every war-torn suburb in the Middle-East to rail against the effects of President Bush's foreign policy, she has not been to Evin prison in Teheran where braver news reporters as well as teenage girls and boys are being tortured and executed for doing simple teenage things that are banal and perfectly legal anywhere else in the free world such as attending or even listening to rock concerts or wearing Western clothes or even merely taking a photograph near the prison.

The continued executions of teenage girls in Iran for "immoral behavior" such as the case of 16 year old Atefah Salaahah in Neka, who was secretly executed for being raped, after being condemned to death by an "appeals" judge who was consequently promoted to be a "minister of justice" in the Ahmadinejad government, was only revealed to the American public in a documentary on the Discovery Times channel after being ignored by CNN in any coverage of the Middle East. In summary, CNN's refusal to reveal the degree of domestic terror being perpetrated by Ahmadinejad and his henchmen has added to the degree of oppression that the Iranian people are being subjected to. ABC has a network news-radio channel broadcasting out of New York called WABC. For nearly ten years, the top-rated news-talk-radio show on week-nights all along the East coast was the John Batchelor show, from 10pm until 1am. This show was structured and organized with interviews from some of the most widely acclaimed and knowledgeable international affairs experts on political, military and social developmements in the US and abroad.

The individuals being interviewed on-air ranged from Khaled Mashaal, one of the leaders of the military wing of Hamas, out of Damascus, to Benjamin Netanyahu out of Israel, to Ali Reza Jafarzadeh representing the Mujahedin Khalq based in a sanctuary in Iraq, and even to Reza Pahlavi, the son of the late Shah. While both Hamas and the Mujahedin Khalq have at some point or another had American blood on their hands, they were still on-air with John Batchelor on WABC. In fact, Jafarzadeh was responsible for the revelation of the degree of advancement of the Iranian nuclear program which seemed to have been ignored by the West until only recently.

However, the main crux of the John Batchelor show was to educate the American public about the surreptitious yet ubiquitous hand of the Iranian regime in fostering terror and war everywhere in the Middle East and abroad to threaten the US and Western civilization in general. Mr. Batchelor, who himself is of partial Iranian descent, and claimed to have once sat in the lap of Mossadegh, was very adamant and unabashed about pointing out the support that the Iranian regime had lent to the foes of peaceful coexistence in Lebanon, the Palestinian Territories, Israel, Afghanistan and especially in Iraq. One of Mr. Batchelor's nightly contributing analysts, John Loftus, would provide information on the Iranian terror network in Iraq that we would not see on other networks or even in the printed news for months to come if ever. Suddenly, one night Mr. Batchelor informed his wide audience that his show had been cancelled by ABC. The American public had lost its only true access to information about the terror campaign being waged against the West by the regime in Iran.

For the week before his last show, ABC and Mr. Batchelor’s call-in line was bombarded with pleas to remain on the air. Inexplicably, this sole access to real-world information on the Iranian terror network disappeared from the airwaves. They say "money talks." In this case, one can only draw the connections between the financial power of the Iranian regime and the corporate greed of WABC. Finally, while Fox News has often being labeled as right-wing in its take on the news, it has nevertheless, failed miserably to reveal to the American public, the degree of oppression being faced by the Iranian citizenry. In particular, its morning talk radio show has failed miserably to reveal the degree of non-representation of the Iranian people’s political wills that the Ahmadinejad regime actually embodies. In other words, Fox News Radio has failed to explain to its listening public that this regime in Tehran is the result of a lack of any free press, political opposition or freedom of expression and is the result of mass arrests, torturing and executions of any and all domestic political opposition prior to the "election."

The American people are now ignorant of the true love that the Iranian people have for the US, peace, freedom and democracy because US media, including Fox News, allowed the Ahmadinejad hijacking of power in Tehran to go unnoticed and unreported. The final straw in establishing my disdain for Fox News Radio came one morning recently when I heard one of their commentators referring to Iran as the "one true democracy in the Middle East." I wanted to pickup my cell-phone and call in to set the record straight. However, unlike the John Batchelor Show, this program had been pre-recorded the day before. The American people are living in an insulated time-warp devoid of any realistic idea of the degree of terror being inflicted on the Iranian people by the thugs, torturers, executioners and terrorists who conveniently call themselves the Islamic Republic of Iran.

Read more!

Wednesday, August 08, 2007

Does a government of gangs and thugs have the right to execute alleged or innocent "gangs" or "hoodlums?





در سراسر گيتی، ايران تنها کشوری است که در ميادين ومعابر عمومی انسانها به در آويخته می شوند واز کودک خردسال گرفته تابزرگسال مجبور به تماشای صحنه های اعدام می گردند تا از مرگ عبرت بگيرند تا در جامعه رعب و وحشت ايجاد نمايند تا انسانها هرگز به فکر تمرد ونافرمانی از حکومت اسلامی به غريزه همنوعی وانسانی خود راه ندهند.


Does a government of gangs and thugs have the right to execute alleged or innocent "gangs" or "hoodlums"?


In the entire universe, Iran is the only country that they execute/hang humans in town squares and public areas. From a young child to an adult have to watch these execution scenes so they can learn a lesson from death so that they don't terrorize society; so that people never think of disobeying the Islamic Republic or act on their humane and compassionate impulses.



اما رژيم اسلامی در اين رهگذر نيز سخت در اشتباه است چراکه با اعدام های دائمی انسانها در خيابانها، مفهوم مرگ را در برابر چشم مردم عادی وبسيار آسان جلوه می دهد و وقتی مفهوم وپروسه مرگ برای انسانها به يک پديده بسيار گذرا وراحت جلوه کند آن جامعه در برابر مرگ بسيار بی رحم و خشن خواهند شد که صدمات روانی جدی خواهد خورد، لذا بجای ترس از مرگ امکان دارد که در برابر مرگ بسيار دلير بشوند چون به اين موضوع پی می برند که آخرخط همه چيز عاقبت مرگ است که کاملا ساده اتفاق می افتد. همواره در تاريخ خوانده ايم که فلان شاه يا حمله گرددر فلان شهر از کشته ها مناره ساخته است ولی اگرازآن انسانهائی که تاکنون همين رژيم اسلامی اعدام کرده است مناره ساخته می شد از اهرام ثلاثه مصر هم مرتفع تر می شد،منتها شاهان صفاک به يکباره می کشتند اما رژيم اسلامی در طی اين بيست وهشت سال و به مرور کشته است!!



But the Islamic Republic is gravely mistaken. Why? Because with these hanging and constant executions in the streets, the concept of *Death* becomes a commonplace in front of their eyes and they will make death look easy.


And when people are desensitized to this concept and procedure, death becomes fleeting and and an easy phenomenon. This, in turn, will make the society more ruthless and violent and instead of instilling fear of death, it will make the person more courageous when facing death for they will realize that at the end of line of everything lies death, which happens easily. We have read throughout history that this King or that King made pyramids of the dead people when they invaded the cities but if they had made a pyramid out of the dead that the Islamic republic has executed, it would be higher than the Great Egyptian Pyramids. The difference is that those ruthless Kings killed people instantly but the Islamic Republic has killed on a gradual and constant pace during this past 28 years.
در جريان قتل های زنجيره ائی شخص بی گناهی که بنام(کامل ناقل خانقاه) در قوه قضائيه از مقام بالائی برخوردار بود در تعقيب دزدان بيت المال بدست مافيا حکومتی به قتل می رسد سپس دائی نامبرده بنام سرتيپ نيروی هوائی نادعلی محمدی که در جستجوی قاتل ويا قاتلين خواهر زاده اش قرار گرفته بود نيز ناجوانمرانه به قتل می رسد. در همين حين برادر( کامل ناقل خانقاه ) که در خارج زندگی می کرد برای تحقيق به ايران می رود که با مافيا حکومتی درگير می شود.حکومت اسلامی سه جوان بی گناه را که مدتها در زندان بسر می بردند را بعنوان قاتلين به خانواده ناقل ومحمدی معرفی می نمايد که بابت اعدام آن سه نفر بيست وهشت ميليون تومان ديه طلب می کند،خانواده آن سه جوان بی گناه با هزار زحمت ومخفيانه به خانواده ناقل ومحمدی مراجعه می نمايند وادعا می کنند که فرزندان آنها با قتلهای عزيزان شما
Note: This last Paragraph is a transliteration...
The Islamic regime these days doesn't think it's necessary to present any evidence against anyone or prove their case in courts after accusing people of committing a crime. The Islamic Republic will arrest anyone and charge him or her without evidence or any due process. Recently, their intelligence agents (MOIS and VEVK or BASIJ) are murdering dissidents in their homes and when the family inquires about the murder, they point out other prisoners already in prison who'd committed non-related crimes in the past.

Read more!

Monday, August 06, 2007

IranGestapo Basiji women ready to bloody more faces








Baseej women members prepare in anticipation for social unrest and civil protests in the Islamic Republic of Iran.More Pictures:FARS News Agency

Read more!

Thursday, August 02, 2007

The Calm before the Storm



January 24, 2006 iranian.com

NEW YORK -- To be perfectly honest, the Islamic Repulic of Iran has an "inalienable right" to acquire nuclear weapons like an unrepentant, convicted and paroled lifetime pedophile has an inalienable right to Viagra.
Today, it appears that the delusional IRI fanatics are brazenly testing the limits of tolerance and inaction of the seemingly feeble Western liberal democracies with their lust to acquire nuclear weapons. With fond recollection of the wartime glories of their massive human-wave martyrdom, they appear quite capable of dragging the entire meek and incapacitated nation to an apocalyptic come-what-may showdown.
However, in the somber new moral calculus formulated by awakened and hardened proactive conservatism in the post-9/11 West, such adventurism can lead to incalculably dire consequences.

One of the lessons of the Islamic revolution in Iran was that 50 years of secular progress did not change the nature of our people.
An analogous argument might be stated for the peoples of present day Western liberal democracies who only 60 years ago unleashed immeasurable, no-hold-barred horrific death and destruction on each other before settling in their cherished but fragile freedom and humane stability of the present day.

For the Western world, the precarious context of the IRI's most alarming adventurism, is the (perhaps exaggerated) threat of Islamofascism in their own midst and in their own lands. With their existential fear of a ticking cultural and demographic bomb, ironically imported and subsidized by their own naïve multiculturalism, one can only speculate what bellicose sentiments could be percolating through the collective minds of the far more powerful peoples of the West. the rest of it.In the face of all this, it is impossible not to sense the heightened fatalism and withdrawal of Iranian people about their dangerously imminent collision with the rest of the world.

Fatalism, amnesia, insincerity and hypocrisy are all hallmarks of traditional Iranian-Shiite culture. For us Iranians the formality of a make-believe ordinary life, however low and diminished, must go on until it is no longer possible. And then, no one knows better, no one saw the end coming and all blame, and ironically all hope, is directed at outsiders...

Now that Iran's violent and crazed quest for identity has finally proven a disastrous failure and has led it to its most isolated, checkmated, indefensible and inexcusable present state of looking into the abyss, the nation appears to be finally facing up to the long overdue reflection for what may be wrong within its own soul. Let's hope that it is not too late to discover gravity...

Having had the privilege to grow up in our ill society, and subsequently the luck to spend half a lifetime to informedly and independently reflect on it from outside, I have a few hopes and insights as to what this soul searching might yield. Figuratively speaking, steadfast Muslims eat their young in the name of god. The gist of Islamic upbringing is about whipping the young to conform and bow to their loser parents, so that every generation is as degenerate as the previous.

The advantage of this discipline is that the faithful are never humiliated, as it is not expected of them to rise to any real challenge, except maybe through jihad and ultimately martyrdom. In turn, the advantage of Jihad is that it fills the place of meaning in life and is cause for unity. Finally the advantage of martyrdom is that one does not survive to get a chance and question the hypocrisy and futility of their lost existence.

Needless to say, no form of progress or achievement ever figures in this degenerative cycle of mediocrity and death wish where the sole purpose of education is indoctrination of faith. To bluntly summarize life under this discipline, one is physically, emotionally and mentally circumcised, veiled, mourned and terrorized from childhood onwards in order to submit to a life of suppressed longings, self-loathing and inconsequence, in return for the lifetime approval of an elder generation of dimwitted losers.

Countless taboos, combined with an elaborate, juicy pornography of sadistic punishments (such as public lashing, stoning, mutilation and execution) are devised to make sure anyone otherwise destined to rise above the commonest admissible form of life becomes the subject of sick psychosexual entertainment for the masses. Anyone still surprised where the crazed want-to-be martyrs and necrophilic suicide/genocide bombers come from?

The uniqueness of us Iranians is that somehow in our collective subconscious, we are aware of the fact that this vile discipline was forced upon us by primitive Arab conquerors in the Middle Ages and even though we, in our own way, did not wholeheartedly buy into it, we nonetheless adopted it with signature docility and have lived with it until today.

That is the essence of the extraordinary self-loathing that paralyzes the Iranian mind and saps our self-esteem and confidence. We, the people who outrage at any hint of being subject, pray (five times a day!) and put faith in a book written in the tongue of our low, despicable conquerors!
For analogy's sake, if Iran were a man, he would be a transsexual, hysterically crying rape and violently ranting at the world over the injustice of his self-mutilated manhood and forgone mojo in the same breath.

To seal our destiny, during the Islamic revolution, we Iranians destroyed or diminished with violent passion and enthusiasm, every symbol, option and institution of rationalism and independent national identity, such as a constitutional monarchy, a patriotic military, a budding modenity and a new national self-esteem derived from our glorious ancient mythology and history.
Instead we invented enemies, demonizing the more rational, prosperous and far more powerful non-Muslim world which has had little to do with our present day moral bankruptcy and impotence.
At this juncture it appears that there is no recourse, no solutions and no ideas from within and once again our fate might have to be dictated with deadly force from outside.

Read more!

Tuesday, July 24, 2007

Pen International issues Iran resolution



Payvand news: The Assembly of Delegates of International PEN, meeting at its 73rd International Congress in Dakar, Senegal, 4 – 11 July 2007

Extremely concerned about the lack of progress in identifying and prosecuting those responsible for the torture and subsequent murder of Iranian-Canadian photojournalist Zahra Kazemi; and the failure to bring to justice those who ordered the serial murders in the late 1990s of Iranian writers and intellectuals;

Shocked by the conviction for spying of freelance business journalist Ali Farahbakhsh on 26 March 2007, who was sentenced to three years in prison; and the two year prison sentence handed down to Iranian Kurdish journalist Kaveh Javanmard on 17 May 2007, as well as the continued detention of the Iranian Kurdish journalists and cultural activists Adnan Hassanpour and Mohammad Sadiq Kabudvand and Iranian Azerbaijani journalists and cultural activists Said Matinpour and Abbas Lissani; as well as the prison sentences of three years and two years and a half years handed down by the court of first instance to Kurdish journalists Ejlal Qavami and Said Sa'edi respectively on 9 June 2007;

Concerned that the security organisations have prevented the Iranian Writers Association from holding its General Assembly to elect its board of directors for the past five years;

Deeply concerned that the authorities have banned the publishing of hundreds of books including those that have already appeared once or several times in print, and have used this policy to pressure independent publishers; prohibited some films and shut down several cultural and artistic organisations;
Further concerned that writers, journalists and others detained in violation of their right to freedom of expression have been tortured in the presence of judges, held for weeks in solitary confinement and denied basic due process rights;
Noting that Iran imprisons the highest number of journalists in the Middle East, violating their rights to freedom of expression and to a fair trial, and often with long periods of incommunicado detention and lack of access to adequate medical care;
Dismayed that the judicial authorities have banned an increasing number of writers and journalists from visiting other countries; and have harassed and persecuted a sizable number of journalists on returning to Iran from training courses abroad;
Troubled by the state crackdown on women's activists and women writers and journalists, which has resulted in dozens being arbitrarily detained, at least eight of whom are facing charges, including prominent women writers and journalists Shadi Sadr, Mahbubeh Abbasgholizadeh, Jila Baniyaghoub and Nahid Keshavarz; and the prison sentences handed down to journalists Nusheen Ahmadi Khorasani, Parvin Ardalan, Sussan Tahmassebi and Fariba Davoodi Mohajer.
Noting that Iran's judiciary has shut down a number of independent newspapers, more than 30 weeklies and other periodicals, mostly in the provinces, and tens of student newsletters in the course of the past year; dozens of journalists and intellectuals have been summoned by authorities and many of them have been prosecuted under the restrictive provisions of the Press Law and Penal Code;
Worried by resolutions that the government adopted in November 2006 to facilitate control of the Internet in Iran, which have been used since that time to ban access to countless Web sites; as a result of which thousands of Web sites are censored, on-line journalists harassed and privately-owned Internet service providers (ISPs) ordered to shut down or put themselves under government control; and including the crackdown on several Iranian "bloggers" who write and post information on the Internet, amongst them prominent Internet writer Arash Sigarchi who was sentenced to 14 years in prison, reduced to three years on appeal, in February 2005;
Deploring the climate of self-censorship induced by the systematic repression of those expressing critical or opposing views against the authorized political and religious doctrines;
Noting with distress that the International Bookfair (TIBF) held in Tehran 1 – 12 March 2007 only gave access to publishers approved by the Iranian government, and that international publishers were separated from domestic publishers, thus diminishing the possibility of a real cultural dialogue between Iranian and foreign writers and publishers;
Alarmed that the Iranian ethnic groups, including Kurds, Azerbaijanis, Arabs and Baluchis, are prohibited from teaching and studying in their own languages;

Further alarmed by the systematic suppression of public and intellectual dissent in Iran;

Urges the government of Iran to:
Release and drop all charges against all political prisoners targeted for the legal exercise of their right to free expression, association and assembly, including Siamak Pourzand and Ali Farahbakhsh; as well as all prisoners detained in violation of Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, to which Iran is a signatory;
Review the Press Law, Penal Code and censorship of book publishing with the aim of the repeal all criminal provisions hindering the peaceful expression of opinion;
Require and maintain the full cooperation of judicial bodies and security forces in ensuring that trials are conducted in accordance with international standards of fairness and that torture is abolished; and to bring to justice those who ordered the murder of Zahra Kazemi and the victims of serial murders of the late 1990s;
Lift the ban on newspapers and periodicals, and to retract resolutions that allow for censorship of the Internet in its many forms and ensure the free flow of information on the Web;

Conduct a thorough investigation of its secret prisons, granting full access to international observers;

Take measures to allow writers and journalists to freely practice their right to freedom of assembly and association;

Take concrete steps to ensure the full and unhindered access to the right to freedom of expression in Iran.And here is the rest of it.

Read more!

Sunday, July 22, 2007

A US Opening to 'Moderate' Islamism?


China Confidential:


"Old habits are hard to break.Like a recidivist abuser of alcohol or drugs, the United States is apparently again attempting to manipulate radical Islam, or Islamism, in order to defeat an enemy, much the way Washington did during the Cold War.

This time around, however, the enemy is not the Soviet Union, which no longer exists--partly because of the US-supported jihad in Afghanistan that proved to be Moscow's Vietnam--but Islamism itself. The US is rerportedly reaching out to oxymoronic moderate-radical Islam to isolate and contain ultra-radical Islam--mainly, Al Qaeda, which was spawned by the struggle in Afghanistan, and assocated jihadist movements. Put differently, the US is seemingly sympathetic to--and tacitly supporting--rightwing political Islam as a counter to far-right political Islam.

Secular alternatives are nowadays no longer in favor in Washington and among key members of the foreign policy establishment; hence, a push to engage, if not embrace, the Muslim Brotherhood--which in reality only differs with Al Qaeda over strategy and tactics and minor theological issues--and the mixed signals sent out by the US to two increasingly threatened Muslim allies: secular, democratic Turkey and Islamic but not yet Islamist, authoritarian Pakistan. Though the two countries are clearly dramatically different in terms of history, culture, and geography, they are both counting on their armed forces to check the Islamist tide.

The military is the political party that matters most in most Muslim societies; and Turkey's military is staunchly secular and can be expected to fight fiercely if need be to preserve Turkey's impressive secular institutions and traditions. In Pakistan, however, the military and intelligence agencies have a sordid history of siding with Islamists--Pakistan basically created and then sustained the Taliban and cooperated closely with Al Qaeda before 9/11--but for reasons that may have more to do with self-preservation than ideology. The nation's intelligence agencies, in particular, have tended to play the Islamist card as a hedge, seeing Islamism as the winning team in the battle for Muslim hearts and minds.

The developing US strategy of supporting supposedly moderate Islamists, guided by an appeasement-oriented State Department, is dangerous and almost certainly as self-destructive, or downright suicidal, as the bipartisan, pro-Islamist policy that spanned some six decades and blew back so horrifically in the Islamist attacks of 9/11. Most immediately, anti-Islamist forces in Turkey and Pakistan are likely to be undermined in ways that may recall Jimmy Carter's craven betrayal of Iran's pro-Western Shah and the Carter administration's failed efforts to cozy up to the Ayatollah Khomeini and his legions of mad mullahs and the secular Iranians whom they duped into helping to bring about the toppling of the modernizing monarch.

POST SCRIPT: Tomorrow, July 22, marks the 28th anniversary of the assassination--on US soil--of Ali A. Tabatabai, who, as founder-president of the Iran Freedom Foundation, had become the most visible and ouspoken opponent of Khomeini's regime. A gentle, dedicated proponent of democracy--though he served as a press attache at Iran's Embassy in Washington, he had actually once been targeted and harassed by Iran's dreaded secret police--Tabatabai was shot to death in his own Bethesda, MD suburban home, not far from the US capital. The killer was Dawud Salahuddin--born David T. Belfield--a US citizen who had converted to Islam, whose photo appears below.




Belfield fled to Tehran, where he still lives under the protection of the monstrous mullahocracy. He confessed to his crime in a chilling on-camera interview with the ABC News program 20/20 that aired on Friday, January 19, 1996. He also admitted to killing Tabatabai in an interview with The New Yorker magazine, describing the deed as "an act of war and a religious duty."

"In Islamic religious terms, taking a life is sometimes sanctioned and even highly praised, and I thought that event was just such a time," Belfield said.

An African-American who grew up in Bayshore, Long Island in a Baptist family, and attended Howard University for one semester, Belfield reportedly converted to Islam at the age of 18. He frequented an Iranian student center run by anti-Shah islamists. During the early 1970s he spent time visiting prisons around Washington to, "bring the message of Islam to black inmates," possibly as part of an Iran-supported recruitment effort.

Belfield has worked as a freelance writer and occasionally traveled to Arab countries and North Korea.

Incrediby, he played a sympathetic major character in the internatinally acclaimed 2001 feature film Kandahar.Back to Bethesda. After killing Tabatabai while disguised as a US Postal mail carrier, Belfield fled the country using a phony passport assumed to have been provided by Iranian agents with the help of Algeria. It is also assumed that the Carter administration allowed Belfield to escape to avoid provoking the Khomeini regime.

Fawning liberal journalists (many of whom cheered the Shah's overthrow) have never confronted or seriously questioned Carter about the assassination.And here is the rest of it."

Peviously Related:

Carter's profile in Incompetence

Iran: Carter's Habitat For Inhumanity

Carter's Islamic Green Belt

Read more!

Friday, July 20, 2007

Amir Taheri on Tehran's hostages

NY Post: Amir Taheri on Haleh Esfandiari, Hamilton, Kian Tajbakhsh and Soros:

...Frequent visitors to Iran, the two had never been molested before. Both belong to groups opposed to regime change in Iran and critical of the Bush policy of challenging the Islamic Republic.

Esfandiari works for the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars - whose director, ex-Rep. Lee Hamilton, has championed normalization with the Islamic Republic for decades. He was a key member of the Iraq Study Group, which urged the opening of a dialogue with Tehran practically on terms demanded by the mullahs.

And Hamilton built his position partly on Esfandiari's advice. The Woodrow Wilson Center has organized numerous workshops on Iran, but seldom invited regime opponents. Its guiding principle was that the Islamic Republic is what most Iranians want, and that America should help the "moderate faction" in Tehran.

Esfandiari's writings on Iran over three decades could be described as sympathetic to the Islamic revolution, although critical of some regime policies, especially on women's issues.

Soros, meanwhile, is an open opponent of Bush's policy on Iran. He has met a number of "moderate Khomeinists," indicating support for their faction. In 2004, he poured $15 million into support for Sen. John Kerry's presidential hopes. Soros would be the last person to want to overthrow the mullahs and hand Bush his biggest victory.


Both Esfandiari and Tajbakhsh have always denounced the anti-mullah opposition as nostalgia-stricken monarchists, residual leftists or worse. Both always refused to grant interviews to Iranian-opposition TV and radio shows beamed from Los Angeles, or to even the U.S.-funded Voice of America. Whatever the two were up to, they did not go to Iran to help liberate it from the Khomeinists.

Some have tried to pin the arrests on feuds within the regime. In this analysis, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and his radical faction feared that the two Americans were looking to help the "moderate faction" (led by ex-President Hashemi Rafsanjani) make a comeback in next year's general election.

Yet Esfandiari hasn't lived in Iran for more than 32 years; she hardly knows enough people to create a "network" for any conspiracy. Similarly, Tajbakhsh hasn't lived in Iran since his teens.

In fact, the two were easy prey for a predatory regime that, unsure of the popular mood, increasingly fears its own shadow. Their illegal arrest and inhuman treatment is part of a broader campaign by the radical revolutionary faction to terrorize its enemies inside Iran and confuse adversaries abroad.

* In recent weeks, some 150,000 women and young men have been arrested, fined, beaten up or kept in prison for days on charges of contravening the Islamic Dress Code enacted last May.

* A massive purge of the universities is under way, with thousands of students, teachers and faculty deans shown the door for allegedly "un-Islamic" sentiments. Over 400 students and teachers are reportedly held in various parts of the country without being charged.

* A state of emergency has been declared in parts of four western provinces, where ethnic minorities live, and in parts of the southeast bordering Pakistan.

* At least 30 trade unionists have been arrested and one of Iran's best-known labor leaders, Mansour Osanloo, abducted by agents of the regime. A news agency covering labor in Iran has been shut down and its assets seized.

* Dozens of newspapers and magazines have been shut and the black list of authors and books has been extended to include hundreds more names and titles.

* Several prominent figures of the rival faction, including a brother of ex-President Muhammad Khatami, face show trials on charges resembling those against Tajbakhsh and Esfandiari.

* Ahmadinejad's faction has also launched a campaign of blackmail against Rafsanjani and his entourage, including Khatami, by threatening to publish details of their alleged corruption and misuse of public funds between 1989 and 2005.

When Tajbakhsh and Esfandiari traveled to Iran a few months ago, they may have believed it would be just another visit to their former homeland. They didn't appreciate the fact that Ahmadinejad means what he says: His "second revolution" is preparing for war against the Iranian middle classes at home and the Western democracies abroad.

The episode underscores two facts: First, no dialogue is possible with a regime that demands nothing short of total submission at home and abroad. Second, the regime feels weak enough to fear a "velvet revolution" led by women, workers, students and, ultimately, even the more moderate clergy. Hmm . . . maybe someone will try it, even though the two captive Americans did not.
. And here is the rest of it.

Read more!

Tuesday, July 17, 2007

If the Walls could speak


Sina Parimard

The untold stories of Iran are taking place within the walls of its prisons. The "benevolent" and "just"(mehrvarz) IRI, just postponed the execution of a minor, Sina Piramard for only 10 days.


Amir Yaquobai
Another young male activist, Amir Yaghoub-Ali, is transferred to the 209 wing of the notorious Evin Prison (the Iranian Gulag) simply because the Judge in his case thinks as a 'male', he should not be supporting women's movement. When his sister asks the judge what is his crime and if talking to people and asking them to sign a petition for women's right is considered illegal, the judge has this to say:



“Being Legal or Illegal is not the issue. The issue for me is the reason of doing this. He is man, so WHY he is active in these women’s issues? He has to study and nothing more”.


Section 209 of notorious Evin prison (the IR's gulag) is also hosting another young student activist, Abolfazl Jahandar, who was arrested last year and he went on a hunger strike today to protest his wretched conditions in prison.

The regime's agents broke up a sit-in marking last week's anniversary of the mass student protest that started on July 9, 1999. Loyal to the IRI tradition, the police responded to the demonstrations by breaking into a university dormitory and storming the offices of a pro-democracy student group, killing one person and injuring 20.
A day earlier, Iran's judiciary confirmed that a man, Jafar Kiani, convicted of adultery has been stoned to death in the province of Qazvin, Takistan. And stoning of his wife, mother of 3 kids, Mokarrameh is looming.

Next, we find out about Khaled Hardani and his family, members of Iran's Arab minority, who was charged with "Battling God" and an execution date was set for July 4. Nothing has been heard from him since.

Whistle blower, Nasser Khirolahi, an Iranian civil servant, has also been tortured repeatedly while being denied representation. His crime was attempting to unveil corruption he observed while working as a civil servant in the mayor's office in the city of Isfahan. He was forced to resign and a short time later was arrested by local intelligence agents. Mr. Khirolahi — who has been observing a hunger strike for more than three weeks — was transferred from the regular political-prisoner section of jail to an area where murderers and other violent offenders are incarcerated. Although his four-year sentence is nearly over, he was told last week that he will not leave the prison alive.

Then we have the shameless propaganda piece of theatrical production of coerced confessions of Dr. Haleh Esfandiari of the Middle East Program at the Woodrow Wilson Center aired on state-run TV. Mrs. Esfandiari was arrested alongside three other Iranian Americans: Parnaz Azima, a U.S.-Iranian journalist who traveled to Iran to visit her family; Kian Tajbakhsh, a consultant to the World Bank and the Open Society Institute; and Ali Shakeri, a businessman and a political activist who had been working with the Centre for Citizen Peace Building at the University of California. All of these people have been incarcerated and prevented from leaving.


Then we have the U.S. State Department announcing its readiness to talk to the corrupt government of the mullahs and Senator Lantos ready to fly to Iran to meet not his counterparts but just anyone in Iran wishing 'positive and normal relations' with the martyr-raising Islamist government.

The world, which seems to only be concerned with centrifuges, apparently isn’t watching. A country brazen enough to kidnap, torture and slaughter its own people and recklessly and irrationally choose a provocational foreign policy threatening not just one but two countries (Israel and Bahrain) is unlikely to be a real partner for any new world order.


h/t to Plateau of Iran




Read more!

Thursday, July 12, 2007

Ahmadinejobless



FP: Iran’s radical president is sinking fast, and he knows it. Now, there’s only one man who can keep Mahmoud Ahmadinejad out of the unemployment line: George W. Bush...more

Read more!

Monday, June 25, 2007

خو کردن به فرومایگی (Learned Helplessness)




Mahmood Ahmadinejad volunteers to become a human shield. Watch the clip here.



گاه مدتی در ایران ِ اسلامی زندگی کنید یا دست ِ کم به روزنامه هایش نگاهی بیندازید تا دریایبد آن چه از تار و پود ِ این جامعه به مشام می رسد به جز فرومایگی چیزی نیست .سر ِ آدمی به دَوَران می افتد ، چشمانش تار می شود وقتی می بیند تیتر ِ اول ِ مطبوعات ِ ایران و اولویت ِ نخستین ِ آنان مربوط به دست دادن ِ خاتمی با چند زن ِ اروپایی است . گویا تنها لکنت ِ میهن ِ لکنته ی ِ ما تماس ِ دو دست ِ نامحرم است . به راستی چه ذهنیتی باعث می شود دست دادن ِ زن و مردی مبدل به مساله ی ِ روز ِ یک ملت شود به جز ذهنیتی برساخته ی ِ آیین ِ دون پرور ِ اسلام ؟ غایت ِ اسلام، فرومایگی است و هرگونه اغماض و انعطاف در برابر ِ آن خودکشی است .همان طور که می دانید خامنه ای سال ِ گذشته را به نام ِ "پیامبر ِ اعظم" نامگذاری کرد و بخش ِ زیادی از بودجه ی ِ فرهنگ ِ ورشکسته ی ِ ما را به آثاری اختصاص داد که درباره ی ِ زندگی و فضیلت های ِ محمد ابن ِ عبدالله ساخته شوند ...more


Link via Nana


Definition of Learned Helplessness

Read more!